Constructing gene models from accurately predicted exons: an application of dynamic programming
Informatics Group, Engineering Physics and Mathematics Division Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6364, USA
1Biology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6364, USA
2To whom reprint requests should be sent
This paper presents a computationally efficient algorithm, the Gene Assembly Program III (GAP III), for constructing gene models from a set of accurately-predicted exons. The input to the algorithm is a set of clusters of exon candidates, generated by a new version of the GRAIL coding region recognition system. The exon candidates of a cluster differ in their presumed edges and occasionally in their reading frames. Each exon candidate has a numerical score representing its probability of being an actual exon. GAP III uses a dynamic programming algorithm to construct a gene model, complete or partial, by optimizing a predefined objective function. The optimal gene models constructed by GAP III correspond very well with the structures of genes which have been determined experimentally and reported in the Genome Sequence Database (GSDB). On a test set of 137 human and mouse DNA sequences consisting of 954 true exons, GAP III constructed 137 gene models using 892 exons, among which 859 (859/954 = 90%) are true exons and 33 (33/892 = 3%) are false positive. Among the 859 true positives, 635 (74%) match the actual exons exactly, and 838 (98%) have at least one edge correct. GAP III is computationally efficient. If we use E and C to represent the total number of exon candidates in all clusters and the number of clusters, respectively, the running time of GAP III is proportional to (E x C).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Kotlar and Y. Lavner Gene Prediction by Spectral Rotation Measure: A New Method for Identifying Protein-Coding Regions Genome Res., August 1, 2003; 13(8): 1930 - 1937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mathe, M.-F. Sagot, T. Schiex, and P. Rouze Current methods of gene prediction, their strengths and weaknesses Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2002; 30(19): 4103 - 4117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Howe, T. Chothia, and R. Durbin GAZE: A Generic Framework for the Integration of Gene-Prediction Data by Dynamic Programming Genome Res., September 1, 2002; 12(9): 1418 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Daigo, T. Nishiwaki, T. Kawasoe, M. Tamari, E. Tsuchiya, and Y. Nakamura Molecular Cloning of a Candidate Tumor Suppressor Gene, DLC1, from Chromosome 3p21.3 Cancer Res., April 1, 1999; 59(8): 1966 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Hayes and M. Borodovsky How to Interpret an Anonymous Bacterial Genome: Machine Learning Approach to Gene Identification Genome Res., November 1, 1998; 8(11): 1154 - 1171. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Mühlebach, T. Wirz, U. Brändle, and J.-C. Perriard Evolution of the Creatine Kinases J. Biol. Chem., May 17, 1996; 271(20): 11920 - 11929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



