Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Briffeuil, P.
Right arrow Articles by Depiereux, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Briffeuil, P.
Right arrow Articles by Depiereux, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics, Vol 14, 357-366, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Comparative analysis of seven multiple protein sequence alignment servers: clues to enhance reliability of predictions

P Briffeuil, G Baudoux, C Lambert, X De Bolle, C Vinals, E Feytmans and E Depiereux
Laboratory of Molecular & Structural Biology, The University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, B-5000 Namur, Belgium.

MOTIVATION: The prediction reliability of seven multiple alignment servers currently available on the Internet (ClustalW, MAP, PIMA, Block Maker, MSA, MEME and Match-Box) has been evaluated in terms of power (sensitivity) and confidence (selectivity). Therefore, the alignments obtained have been respectively compared to refined structural alignments for 20 families of related proteins with low levels of identity. RESULTS: Results clearly show that any powerful method remains reliable when the rate of identity falls. For some methods, power and confidence decrease linearly with the rate of identity, while other methods emphasize reliability at the cost of a lower power. Increasing the number of related sequences included in the alignment may either improve or decrease the quality of the predictions substantially. For some methods, the gain in power or in confidence is quite systematic; for others, the effect of the addition of homologous sequences is highly unpredictable. Extracting the consensus between two different methods may increase the overall confidence of the predictions tremendously. Our conclusions induce users of sequence alignment methods on the Internet to select the most suitable technique according to their requirements in terms of selectivity and sensitivity. AVAILABILITY: The aligned sequences of the 20 alignments of structure can be obtained automatically by sending the message 'send: cabios_tests.txt' by e-mail to 'matchbox@biq.fundp.ac.be'. CONTACT: eric.depiereux@fundp.ac.be
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. Ye and X. Huang
MAP2: multiple alignment of syntenic genomic sequences
Nucleic Acids Res., January 7, 2005; 33(1): 162 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
W.-G. Qiu, N. Schisler, and A. Stoltzfus
The Evolutionary Gain of Spliceosomal Introns: Sequence and Phase Preferences
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1252 - 1263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Bakalara, X. Santarelli, C. Davis, and T. Baltz
Purification, Cloning, and Characterization of an Acidic Ectoprotein Phosphatase Differentially Expressed in the Infectious Bloodstream Form of Trypanosoma brucei
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2000; 275(12): 8863 - 8871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
V. Geetha, V. Di Francesco, J. Garnier, and P. J. Munson
Comparing protein sequence-based and predicted secondary structure-based methods for identification of remote homologs
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., July 1, 1999; 12(7): 527 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.