Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tipton, K.
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tipton, K.
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 16 no. 1 2000
Pages 34-40
© 2000 Oxford University Press

History of the enzyme nomenclature system

Keith Tipton 1 and Sinéad Boyce 1

1 Department of Biochemistry, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

Naming things is essential for people to understand one another, no matter what language or field of interest is involved. This is as true for enzymes, genes and chemicals as it is for birds, food, flowers, etc. Effective communication requires a lack of ambiguity, but, in practice, ambiguities abound even between people who use the same language in different parts of the world, or even within the same country. Whereas ambiguities in the words used for common objects or actions have been the basis for many, more-or-less memorable jokes, they can also cause a great deal of confusion. Such linguistic chaos is welcomed by many as being a part of a diverse heritage that should be preserved at all costs to prevent us from descending into Orwellian ‘newspeak’. However, in the sciences, there are distinct advantages in others being able to understand what one is doing. Many groups have stressed the need for standardized, universally accepted systems of nomenclature in chemistry, genetics, enzymology, etc. However, it is the universal acceptance that usually causes the problem. It is rare to find people who will admit that they find nomenclature to be an interesting subject, but many who profess contempt for it will get very excited if it is suggested that their pet nomenclature should be changed in the interest of clarity or uniformity. This account will consider the development of the enzyme nomenclature system, its benefits, shortcomings and future prospects.

Contact: ktipton{at}tcd.ie


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
H. Liu, Z.-Z. Hu, J. Zhang, and C. Wu
BioThesaurus: a web-based thesaurus of protein and gene names
Bioinformatics, January 1, 2006; 22(1): 103 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
V. Hatzimanikatis, C. Li, J. A. Ionita, C. S. Henry, M. D. Jankowski, and L. J. Broadbelt
Exploring the diversity of complex metabolic networks
Bioinformatics, April 15, 2005; 21(8): 1603 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Fleischmann, M. Darsow, K. Degtyarenko, W. Fleischmann, S. Boyce, K. B. Axelsen, A. Bairoch, D. Schomburg, K. F. Tipton, and R. Apweiler
IntEnz, the integrated relational enzyme database
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2004; 32(90001): D434 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.