Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hughey, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hughey, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 16 no. 12 2000
Pages 1082-1090
© 2000 Oxford University Press


Original Paper

Optimizing reduced-space sequence analysis

Raymond Wheeler 1,2 and Richard Hughey 1,3

1 Department of Computer Engineering, Jack Baskin School of Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA

Received on October 5, 1999 ; revised on May 15, 2000 ; accepted on July 25, 2000

Motivation: Dynamic programming is the core algorithm of sequence comparison, alignment and linear hidden Markov model (HMM) training. For a pair of sequence lengths m and n, the problem can be solved readily in O(mn)time and O(mn)space. The checkpoint algorithm introduced by Grice et al. (CABIOS , 13, 45–53, 1997) runs in O(Lmn)time and O(LmL{surd}n)space, where Lis a positive integer determined by m, n, and the amount of available workspace. The algorithm is appropriate for many string comparison problems, including all-paths and single-best-path hidden Markov model training, and is readily parallelizable. The checkpoint algorithm has a diagonal version that can solve the single-best-path alignment problem in O(mn)time and O(m + n)space.

Results: In this work, we improve performance by analyzing optimal checkpoint placement. The improved row checkpoint algorithm performs up to one half the computation of the original algorithm. The improved diagonal checkpoint algorithm performs up to 35% fewer computational steps than the original. We modified the SAM hidden Markov modeling package to use the improved row checkpoint algorithm. For a fixed sequence length, the new version is up to 33% faster for all-paths and 56% faster for single-best-path HMM training, depending on sequence length and allocated memory. Over a typical set of protein sequence lengths, the improvement is ~10%.

Availability: The SAM hidden Markov modeling package is freely available for academic use from http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/sam.html. The C++code used to find optimal checkpoint placements is available from http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/kestrel.

Contact: rph{at}cse.ucsc.edu

2 Current address: Neomorphic, 2612 8th St., Berkeley, CA 94710, USA.

3 To whom correspondence may be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
L. A. Newberg
Memory-efficient dynamic programming backtrace and pairwise local sequence alignment
Bioinformatics, August 15, 2008; 24(16): 1772 - 1778.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
E. Keibler, M. Arumugam, and M. R. Brent
The Treeterbi and Parallel Treeterbi algorithms: efficient, optimal decoding for ordinary, generalized and pair HMMs
Bioinformatics, March 1, 2007; 23(5): 545 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.