Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alves, R.
Right arrow Articles by Savageau, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alves, R.
Right arrow Articles by Savageau, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 16 no. 6 2000
Pages 527-533
© 2000 Oxford University Press


Original Paper

Comparing systemic properties of ensembles of biological networks by graphical and statistical methods

Rui Alves 1,2,3 and Michael A. Savageau 1,*

1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, 5641 Medical Science Building II Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0620, USA
2 Grupo de Bioquimica e Biologia Teoricas, Instituto Rocha Cabral, Calcada Bento da Rocha Cabral 14, 1250 Lisboa, Portugal
3 Programa Gulbenkian de Doutoramentos em Biologia e Medicina, Departamento de Ensino, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 1800 Oeiras, Portugal

Received on July 28, 1999 ; revised on November 11, 1999 ; accepted on December 3, 1999

Motivation: When dealing with questions that concern a general class of models for biological networks, large numbers of distinct models within the class can be grouped into an ensemble that gives a statistical view of the properties for the general class. Comparing properties of different ensembles through the use of point measures (e.g. medians, standard deviations, correlation coefficients) can mask inhomogeneities in the correlations between properties. We are therefore motivated to develop strategies that allow these inhomogeneities to be more easily detected.

Results: Methods are described for constructing ensembles of models within the context of a Mathematically Controlled Comparison. A Density of Ratios Plot for a given systemic property is then defined as follows: the axis represents the value of the systemic property in a reference model divided by the value in the alternative model, and the axis represents the value of the systemic property in the reference model. Techniques involving moving quantiles are introduced to generate secondary plots in which correlations and inhomogeneities in correlations are more easily detected. Several examples that illustrate the advantages of these techniques are presented and discussed.

Contact: Savageau{at}umich.edu

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
N. D. Price, J. Schellenberger, and B. O. Palsson
Uniform Sampling of Steady-State Flux Spaces: Means to Design Experiments and to Interpret Enzymopathies
Biophys. J., October 1, 2004; 87(4): 2172 - 2186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.