Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dietmann, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frömmel, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dietmann, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frömmel, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 18 no. 1 2002
Pages 167-174
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Prediction of 3D neighbours of molecular surface patches in proteins by artificial neural networks

S. Dietmann 1,2 and C. Frömmel 1,*

1 Medical Faculty of the Humboldt University, (Charité) Institute of Biochemistry, Monbijoustr. 2A, Berlin D-10117, Germany

Received on March 13, 2001 ; revised on September 4, 2001 ; accepted on September 7, 2001

Motivation: Molecular Surface Patches (MSPs) of proteins are responsible for selective interactions between internal parts of one protein molecule or between protein and other molecules. The prediction of the neighbours of a distinct Secondary Structural Element (SSE) would be an important step for protein structure prediction.

Results: Based on a computational analysis of complementary molecular patches of SSEs, feed-forward Neural Networks (NNs) are trained on a large set of helices for predicting the neighbours of given MSPs. Accuracy of prediction is 96% if only two types of neighbours: solvent or ‘protein’ are considered, yet drops to 81% for three types of neighbours: (1) solvent, (2) helix/strand or (3) coil. Implications of the method for the prediction of protein structure and subunit interaction are discussed. As a special test case, the structurally equivalent helices of monomeric myoglobin and the homologous subunits of tetrameric haemoglobin are compared.

Availability: Programs are available on request from the authors.

Contact: dietmann{at}ebi.ac.uk; cornelius.froemmel{at}charite.de

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

2 Present address: EMBL Qutstation EBI, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 ISD, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.