Bioinformatics Vol. 18 no. 8 2002
Pages 1102-1108
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Simplifying amino acid alphabets by means of a branch and bound algorithm and substitution matrices
CRIBI Biotechnology Centre, Universitá di Padova, via Ugo Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy
Received on September 6, 2001
; revised on January 8, 2002
; accepted on
Motivation: Protein and DNA are generally represented by sequences of letters. In a number of circumstances simplified alphabets (where one or more letters would be represented by the same symbol) have proved their potential utility in several fields of bioinformatics including searching for patterns occurring at an unexpected rate, studying protein folding and finding consensus sequences in multiple alignments. The main issue addressed in this paper is the possibility of finding a general approach that would allow an exhaustive analysis of all the possible simplified alphabets, using substitution matrices like PAM and BLOSUM as a measure for scoring.
Results: The computational approach presented in this paper has led to a computer program called AlphaSimp (Alphabet Simplifier) that can perform an exhaustive analysis of the possible simplified amino acid alphabets, using a branch and bound algorithm together with standard or user-defined substitution matrices. The program returns a ranked list of the highest-scoring simplified alphabets. When the extent of the simplification is limited and the simplified alphabets are maintained above ten symbols the program is able to complete the analysis in minutes or even seconds on a personal computer. However, the performance becomes worse, taking up to several hours, for highly simplified alphabets.
Availability: AlphaSimp and other accessory programs are available at http://bioinformatics.cribi.unipd.it/alphasimp
Contact: giorgio.valle{at}unipd.it
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. N. Davies, A. Secker, A. A. Freitas, E. Clark, J. Timmis, and D. R. Flower Optimizing amino acid groupings for GPCR classification Bioinformatics, September 15, 2008; 24(18): 1980 - 1986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Susko and A. J. Roger On Reduced Amino Acid Alphabets for Phylogenetic Inference Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2139 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Li, K. Fan, J. Wang, and W. Wang Reduction of protein sequence complexity by residue grouping Protein Eng. Des. Sel., May 1, 2003; 16(5): 323 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


