Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Spouge, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Spouge, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 18 no. 9 2002
Pages 1236-1242
© 2002 Oxford University Press

The correlation error and finite-size correction in an ungapped sequence alignment

Yonil Park 1 and John L. Spouge 1,*

1 National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA

Received on October 15, 2001 ; revised on January 18, 2002 ; accepted on December 3, 2002

Motivation: The BLAST program for comparing two sequences assumes independent sequences in its random model. The resulting random alignment matrices have correlations across their diagonals. Analytic formulas for the BLAST p-value essentially neglect these correlations and are equivalent to a random model with independent diagonals. Progress on the independent diagonals model has been surprisingly rapid, but the practical magnitude of the correlations it neglects remains unknown. In addition, BLAST uses a finite-size correction that is particularly important when either of the sequences being compared is short. Several formulas for the finite-size correction have now been given, but the corresponding errors in the BLAST p-values have not been quantified. As the lengths of compared sequences tend to infinity, it is also theoretically unknown whether the neglected correlations vanish faster than the finite-size correction.

Results: Because we required certain analytic formulas, our study restricted its computer experiments to ungapped sequence alignment. We expect some of our conclusions to extend qualitatively to gapped sequence alignment, however. With this caveat, the finite-size correction appeared to vanish faster than the neglected correlations. Although the finite-size correction underestimated the BLAST p-value, it improved the approximation substantially for all but very short sequences. In practice, the Altschul–Gish finite-size correction was superior to Spouge's. The independent diagonals model was always within a factor of 2 of the true BLAST p-value, although fitting p-value parameters from it probably is unwise.

Contact: spouge{at}ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
A. Yu. Mitrophanov and M. Borodovsky
Statistical significance in biological sequence analysis
Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2006; 7(1): 2 - 24.



Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Karlin
Colloquium Perspective: Statistical signals in bioinformatics
PNAS, September 20, 2005; 102(38): 13355 - 13362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. C. Frith, U. Hansen, J. L. Spouge, and Z. Weng
Finding functional sequence elements by multiple local alignment
Nucleic Acids Res., January 2, 2004; 32(1): 189 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.