Bioinformatics Vol. 18 no. 90001 2002
Pages S337-S344
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Identifying operons and untranslated regions of transcripts using Escherichia coli RNA expression analysis
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
University of Washington, Box 352350, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
2 Department of Radiology, University of Washington,
University of Washington, Box 356004, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
4 Institute for Systems Biology,
1441 North 34th St., Seattle, WA 98103, USA
4 Affymetrix Inc., 3380 Central Expressway,
Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA
Received on January 22, 2002
; revised on March 29, 2002
; accepted on March 29, 2002
Microarrays traditionally have been used to assay the transcript expression of coding regions of genes. Here, we use Escherichia coli oligonucleotide microarrays to assay transcript expression of both open reading frames (ORFs) and intergenic regions. We then use hidden Markov models to analyse this expression data and estimate transcription boundaries of genes. This approach allows us to identify 5' untranslated regions (5' UTRs) of transcripts as well as genes that are likely to be operon members. The operon elements we identify correspond to documented operons with 99% specificity and 63% sensitivity. Similarly we find that our 5' UTR results accurately coincide with experimentally verified promoter regions for most genes.
Contact: tjaden{at}cs.washington.edu
Keywords: untranslated regions; operons; intergenic; microarrays; Escherichia coli.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Charaniya, S. Mehra, W. Lian, K. P. Jayapal, G. Karypis, and W.-S. Hu Transcriptome dynamics-based operon prediction and verification in Streptomyces coelicolor Nucleic Acids Res., December 18, 2007; 35(21): 7222 - 7236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Harr and C. Schlotterer Comparison of algorithms for the analysis of Affymetrix microarray data as evaluated by co-expression of genes in known operons Nucleic Acids Res., January 23, 2006; 34(2): e8 - e8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Westover, J. D. Buhler, J. L. Sonnenburg, and J. I. Gordon Operon prediction without a training set Bioinformatics, April 1, 2005; 21(7): 880 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kolker, K. S. Makarova, S. Shabalina, A. F. Picone, S. Purvine, T. Holzman, T. Cherny, D. Armbruster, R. S. Munson Jr, G. Kolesov, et al. Identification and functional analysis of 'hypothetical' genes expressed in Haemophilus influenzae Nucleic Acids Res., April 30, 2004; 32(8): 2353 - 2361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nagpal, M. W. Karaman, M. M. Timmerman, V. V. Ho, B. L. Pike, and J. G. Hacia Improving the sensitivity and specificity of gene expression analysis in highly related organisms through the use of electronic masks Nucleic Acids Res., March 18, 2004; 32(5): e51 - e51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kolker, S. Purvine, M. Y. Galperin, S. Stolyar, D. R. Goodlett, A. I. Nesvizhskii, A. Keller, T. Xie, J. K. Eng, E. Yi, et al. Initial Proteome Analysis of Model Microorganism Haemophilus influenzae Strain Rd KW20 J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2003; 185(15): 4593 - 4602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


