Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pan, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pan, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 19 no. 11 2003
Pages 1333-1340
© 2003 Oxford University Press

On the use of permutation in and the performance of a class of nonparametric methods to detect differential gene expression

Wei Pan

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, A460 Mayo Building (MMC 303), Minneapolis, MN 55455-0378, USA

Received on September 20, 2002 ; revised on December 2, 2002 ; accepted on January 30, 2003

Motivation: Recently a class of nonparametric statistical methods, including the empirical Bayes (EB) method, the significance analysis of microarray (SAM) method and the mixture model method (MMM), have been proposed to detect differential gene expression for replicated microarray experiments conducted under two conditions. All the methods depend on constructing a test statistic Z and a so-called null statistic z. The null statistic z is used to provide some reference distribution for Z such that statistical inference can be accomplished. A common way of constructing z is to apply Z to randomly permuted data. Here we point our that the distribution of z may not approximate the null distribution of Z well, leading to possibly too conservative inference. This observation may apply to other permutation-based nonparametric methods. We propose a new method of constructing a null statistic that aims to estimate the null distribution of a test statistic directly.

Results: Using simulated data and real data, we assess and compare the performance of the existing method and our new method when applied in EB, SAM and MMM. Some interesting findings on operating characteristics of EB, SAM and MMM are also reported. Finally, by combining the idea of SAM and MMM, we outline a simple nonparametric method based on the direct use of a test statistic and a null statistic.

Contact: weip{at}biostat.umn.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. Jiao and S. Zhang
On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator
Bioinformatics, August 1, 2008; 24(15): 1655 - 1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
J. Xu and X. Cui
Robustified MANOVA with applications in detecting differentially expressed genes from oligonucleotide arrays
Bioinformatics, April 15, 2008; 24(8): 1056 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Y. Saeys, I. Inza, and P. Larranaga
A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics
Bioinformatics, October 1, 2007; 23(19): 2507 - 2517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
A. Begun
Robust method for detecting differential gene expression in twin studies
Bioinformatics, December 1, 2006; 22(23): 2905 - 2909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
T. Park, S.-G. Yi, Y. K. Shin, and S. Lee
Combining multiple microarrays in the presence of controlling variables
Bioinformatics, July 15, 2006; 22(14): 1682 - 1689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
G.J. McLachlan, R.W. Bean, and L. B.-T. Jones
A simple implementation of a normal mixture approach to differential gene expression in multiclass microarrays
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2006; 22(13): 1608 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
X. Gao
Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments
Bioinformatics, June 15, 2006; 22(12): 1486 - 1494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Y. Xie, W. Pan, and A. B. Khodursky
A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data
Bioinformatics, December 1, 2005; 21(23): 4280 - 4288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K.-H. Pan, C.-J. Lih, and S. N. Cohen
Effects of threshold choice on biological conclusions reached during analysis of gene expression by DNA microarrays
PNAS, June 21, 2005; 102(25): 8961 - 8965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
G. R. Grant, J. Liu, and C. J. Stoeckert Jr.
A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data
Bioinformatics, June 1, 2005; 21(11): 2684 - 2690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
B. Wu
Differential gene expression detection using penalized linear regression models: the improved SAM statistics
Bioinformatics, April 15, 2005; 21(8): 1565 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.