Bioinformatics Vol. 19 no. 11 2003
Pages 1341-1347
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Quantitative quality control in microarray experiments and the application in data filtering, normalization and false positive rate prediction
Max McGee National Research Center for Juvenile Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College and Childrens Hospital of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
Received on December 4, 2002
; revised on January 27, 2003
; accepted on January 29, 2003
Abstract: Data preprocessing including proper normalization and adequate quality control before complex data mining is crucial for studies using the cDNA microarray technology. We have developed a simple procedure that integrates data filtering and normalization with quantitative quality control of microarray experiments. Previously we have shown that data variability in a microarray experiment can be very well captured by a quality score qcom that is defined for every spot, and the ratio distribution depends on qcom. Utilizing this knowledge, our data-filtering scheme allows the investigator to decide on the filtering stringency according to desired data variability, and our normalization procedure corrects the qcom-dependent dye biases in terms of both the location and the spread of the ratio distribution. In addition, we propose a statistical model for false positive rate determination based on the design and the quality of a microarray experiment. The model predicts that a lower limit of 0.5 for the replicate concordance rate is needed in order to be certain of true positives. Our work demonstrates the importance and advantages of having a quantitative quality control scheme for microarrays.
Contact: xujing{at}mcw.edu
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Jesch, P. Liu, X. Zhao, M. T. Wells, and S. A. Henry Multiple Endoplasmic Reticulum-to-Nucleus Signaling Pathways Coordinate Phospholipid Metabolism with Gene Expression by Distinct Mechanisms J. Biol. Chem., August 18, 2006; 281(33): 24070 - 24083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Hessner, B. Xiang, S. Jia, R. Geoffrey, S. Holmes, L. Meyer, S. Muheisen, and X. Wang Three-color cDNA microarrays with prehybridization quality control yield gene expression data comparable to that of commercial platforms Physiol Genomics, March 13, 2006; 25(1): 166 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wu, A. Kajdacsy-Balla, E. Strawn, Z. Basir, G. Halverson, P. Jailwala, Y. Wang, X. Wang, S. Ghosh, and S.-W. Guo Transcriptional Characterizations of Differences between Eutopic and Ectopic Endometrium Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 232 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Sauer, C. Preininger, and R. Hany-Schmatzberger Quick and simple: quality control of microarray data Bioinformatics, April 15, 2005; 21(8): 1572 - 1578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Jesch, X. Zhao, M. T. Wells, and S. A. Henry Genome-wide Analysis Reveals Inositol, Not Choline, as the Major Effector of Ino2p-Ino4p and Unfolded Protein Response Target Gene Expression in Yeast J. Biol. Chem., March 11, 2005; 280(10): 9106 - 9118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



