Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (83)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wu, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 19 no. 13 2003
Pages 1636-1643
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Comparison of statistical methods for classification of ovarian cancer using mass spectrometry data

Baolin Wu 1, Tom Abbott 2, David Fishman 5, Walter McMurray 2, Gil Mor 3, Kathryn Stone 2, David Ward 4, Kenneth Williams 2 and Hongyu Zhao 1,4,*

1 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, 2 HHMI Biopolymer/Keck Laboratory, 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4 Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA and 5 Department of OB/GYN, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

Received on December 18, 2002 ; revised on March 3, 2003 ; accepted on March 6, 2003

Motivation: Novel methods, both molecular and statistical, are urgently needed to take advantage of recent advances in biotechnology and the human genome project for disease diagnosis and prognosis. Mass spectrometry (MS) holds great promise for biomarker identification and genome-wide protein profiling. It has been demonstrated in the literature that biomarkers can be identified to distinguish normal individuals from cancer patients using MS data. Such progress is especially exciting for the detection of early-stage ovarian cancer patients. Although various statistical methods have been utilized to identify biomarkers from MS data, there has been no systematic comparison among these approaches in their relative ability to analyze MS data.

Results: We compare the performance of several classes of statistical methods for the classification of cancer based on MS spectra. These methods include: linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbor classifier, bagging and boosting classification trees, support vector machine, and random forest (RF). The methods are applied to ovarian cancer and control serum samples from the National Ovarian Cancer Early Detection Program clinic at Northwestern University Hospital. We found that RF outperforms other methods in the analysis of MS data.

Supplementary information: http://bioinformatics.med.yale.edu/proteomics/BioSupp1.html

Contact: hongyu.zhao{at}yale.edu

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
J. H. Oh, Y. B. Kim, P. Gurnani, K. P. Rosenblatt, and J. X. Gao
Biomarker selection and sample prediction for multi-category disease on MALDI-TOF data
Bioinformatics, August 15, 2008; 24(16): 1812 - 1818.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
M. Hilario and A. Kalousis
Approaches to dimensionality reduction in proteomic biomarker studies
Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2008; 9(2): 102 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Guo, Z. Chen, L. Zhang, F. Zhou, S. Shi, X. Feng, B. Li, X. Meng, X. Ma, M. Luo, et al.
Distinctive MicroRNA Profiles Relating to Patient Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 68(1): 26 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
Y. Lai
A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data
Biostat., October 1, 2007; 8(4): 744 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Y. Saeys, I. Inza, and P. Larranaga
A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics
Bioinformatics, October 1, 2007; 23(19): 2507 - 2517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. McIlwain, D. Page, E. L. Huttlin, and M. R. Sussman
Using dynamic programming to create isotopic distribution maps from mass spectra
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2007; 23(13): i328 - i336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Y. Park, S. R. Downing, D. Kim, W. C. Hahn, C. Li, P. W. Kantoff, and L.J. Wei
Simultaneous and exact interval estimates for the contrast of two groups based on an extremely high dimensional variable: application to mass spec data
Bioinformatics, June 15, 2007; 23(12): 1451 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
C. C. Walker, K. A. Salinas, P. S. Harris, S. S. Wilkinson, J. D. Watts, and M. J. Hemmer
A Proteomic (SELDI-TOF-MS) Approach to Estrogen Agonist Screening
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2007; 95(1): 74 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. E. Moore, E. T. Fung, M. McGuire, C. C. Rabkin, A. Molinaro, Z. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Yip, X.-Y. Meng, et al.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein A1 and posttranslationally modified forms of transthyretin as biomarkers for ovarian cancer detection in an independent study population.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 1641 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
H. Pang, A. Lin, M. Holford, B. E. Enerson, B. Lu, M. P. Lawton, E. Floyd, and H. Zhao
Pathway analysis using random forests classification and regression
Bioinformatics, August 15, 2006; 22(16): 2028 - 2036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
P. Larranaga, B. Calvo, R. Santana, C. Bielza, J. Galdiano, I. Inza, J. A. Lozano, R. Armananzas, G. Santafe, A. Perez, et al.
Machine learning in bioinformatics
Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2006; 7(1): 86 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
B. Wu
Differential gene expression detection and sample classification using penalized linear regression models
Bioinformatics, February 15, 2006; 22(4): 472 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Chung, D. Clifford, M. Buckley, and R. C. Baxter
Novel Biomarkers of Human Growth Hormone Action from Serum Proteomic Profiling Using Protein Chip Mass Spectrometry
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 671 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
T. W. Randolph, B. L. Mitchell, D. F. McLerran, P. D. Lampe, and Z. Feng
Quantifying Peptide Signal in MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Data
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2005; 4(12): 1990 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Spentzos, D. A. Levine, S. Kolia, H. Otu, J. Boyd, T. A. Libermann, and S. A. Cannistra
Unique Gene Expression Profile Based on Pathologic Response in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2005; 23(31): 7911 - 7918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
P. Geurts, M. Fillet, D. de Seny, M.-A. Meuwis, M. Malaise, M.-P. Merville, and L. Wehenkel
Proteomic mass spectra classification using decision tree based ensemble methods
Bioinformatics, July 15, 2005; 21(14): 3138 - 3145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. Bao, M. Zhou, and Y. Cui
nsSNPAnalyzer: identifying disease-associated nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2005; 33(suppl_2): W480 - W482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
L. Bao and Y. Cui
Prediction of the phenotypic effects of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms using structural and evolutionary information
Bioinformatics, May 15, 2005; 21(10): 2185 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
J. S. Yu, S. Ongarello, R. Fiedler, X. W. Chen, G. Toffolo, C. Cobelli, and Z. Trajanoski
Ovarian cancer identification based on dimensionality reduction for high-throughput mass spectrometry data
Bioinformatics, May 15, 2005; 21(10): 2200 - 2209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
J. Listgarten and A. Emili
Statistical and Computational Methods for Comparative Proteomic Profiling Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2005; 4(4): 419 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Z. Guan and H. Zhao
A semiparametric approach for marker gene selection based on gene expression data
Bioinformatics, February 15, 2005; 21(4): 529 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
N. Carriero, M. V. Osier, K.-H. Cheung, P. L. Miller, M. Gerstein, H. Zhao, B. Wu, S. Rifkin, J. Chang, H. Zhang, et al.
A High Productivity/Low Maintenance Approach to High-performance Computation for Biomedicine: Four Case Studies
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2005; 12(1): 90 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Spentzos, D. A. Levine, M. F. Ramoni, M. Joseph, X. Gu, J. Boyd, Towia. A. Libermann, and S. A. Cannistra
Gene Expression Signature With Independent Prognostic Significance in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2004; 22(23): 4700 - 4710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.