Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gomez, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rzhetsky, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gomez, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rzhetsky, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 19 no. 15 2003
pages 1875-1881
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Learning to predict protein–protein interactions from protein sequences

Shawn M. Gomez 1,*, William Stafford Noble 2 and Andrey Rzhetsky 3

1 Unité de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire des Insectes, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France, 2 Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA and 3 Columbia Genome Center, Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (C2B2), Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, USA

Received on May 1, 2003 ; revised on July 15, 2003 ; accepted on July 15, 2003

In order to understand the molecular machinery of the cell, we need to know about the multitude of protein–protein interactions that allow the cell to function. High-throughput technologies provide some data about these interactions, but so far that data is fairly noisy. Therefore, computational techniques for predicting protein–protein interactions could be of significant value. One approach to predicting interactions in silico is to produce from first principles a detailed model of a candidate interaction. We take an alternative approach, employing a relatively simple model that learns dynamically from a large collection of data. In this work, we describe an attractionrepulsion model, in which the interaction between a pair of proteins is represented as the sum of attractive and repulsive forces associated with small, domain- or motif-sized features along the length of each protein. The model is discriminative, learning simultaneously from known interactions and from pairs of proteins that are known (or suspected) not to interact. The model is efficient to compute and scales well to very large collections of data. In a cross-validated comparison using known yeast interactions, the attraction–repulsion method performs better than several competing techniques.

Contact: sgomez{at}pasteur.fr

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Z. Wunderlich and L. A. Mirny
Using genome-wide measurements for computational prediction of SH2-peptide interactions
Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2009; 37(14): 4629 - 4641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Akiva, Z. Itzhaki, and H. Margalit
Built-in loops allow versatility in domain-domain interactions: Lessons from self-interacting domains
PNAS, September 9, 2008; 105(36): 13292 - 13297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
R. Saeed and C. Deane
An assessment of the uses of homologous interactions
Bioinformatics, March 1, 2008; 24(5): 689 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
N. Nagamine and Y. Sakakibara
Statistical prediction of protein chemical interactions based on chemical structure and mass spectrometry data
Bioinformatics, August 1, 2007; 23(15): 2004 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. J. Cockell, B. Oliva, and R. M. Jackson
Structure-based evaluation of in silico predictions of protein protein interactions using Comparative Docking
Bioinformatics, March 1, 2007; 23(5): 573 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. R. Jefferson, T. P. Walsh, T. J. Roberts, and G. J. Barton
SNAPPI-DB: a database and API of Structures, iNterfaces and Alignments for Protein-Protein Interactions
Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(suppl_1): D580 - D589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Sprinzak, Y. Altuvia, and H. Margalit
Colloquium Papers: Characterization and prediction of protein-protein interactions within and between complexes
PNAS, October 3, 2006; 103(40): 14718 - 14723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
E. Duprat, M.-P. Lefranc, and O. Gascuel
A simple method to predict protein-binding from aligned sequences--application to MHC superfamily and {beta}2-microglobulin
Bioinformatics, February 15, 2006; 22(4): 453 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Y. Liu, N. Liu, and H. Zhao
Inferring protein-protein interactions through high-throughput interaction data from diverse organisms
Bioinformatics, August 1, 2005; 21(15): 3279 - 3285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.