Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doytchinova, I.A.
Right arrow Articles by Flower, D.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doytchinova, I.A.
Right arrow Articles by Flower, D.R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 19 no. 17 2003
pages 2263-2270
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Towards the in silico identification of class II restricted T-cell epitopes: a partial least squares iterative self-consistent algorithm for affinity prediction

I.A. Doytchinova and D.R. Flower *

Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research, Compton, Berkshire RG20 7NN, UK

Received on November 22, 2002 ; revised on February 26, 2003 ; accepted on May 20, 2003

Motivation: The immunogenicity of peptides depends on their ability to bind to MHC molecules. MHC binding affinity prediction methods can save significant amounts of experimental work. The class II MHC binding site is open at both ends, making epitope prediction difficult because of the multiple binding ability of long peptides.

Results: An iterative self-consistent partial least squares (PLS)-based additive method was applied to a set of 66 peptides no longer than 16 amino acids, binding to DRB1*0401. A regression equation containing the quantitative contributions of the amino acids at each of the nine positions was generated. Its predictability was tested using two external test sets which gave rpred = 0.593 and rpred = 0.655, respectively. Furthermore, it was benchmarked using 25 known T-cell epitopes restricted by DRB1*0401 and we compared our results with four other online predictive methods. The additive method showed the best result finding 24 of the 25 T-cell epitopes.

Availability: Peptides used in the study are available from http://www.jenner.ac.uk/JenPep. The PLS method is available commercially in the SYBYL molecular modelling software package. The final model for affinity prediction of peptides binding to DRB1*0401 molecule is available at http://www.jenner.ac.uk/MHCPred. Models developed for DRB1*0101 and DRB1*0701 also are available in MHCPred.

Contact: darren.flower{at}jenner.ac.uk

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
S. T. Chang, D. Ghosh, D. E. Kirschner, and J. J. Linderman
Peptide length-based prediction of peptide-MHC class II binding
Bioinformatics, November 15, 2006; 22(22): 2761 - 2767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
J. C. Tong, G. L. Zhang, T. W. Tan, J. T. August, V. Brusic, and S. Ranganathan
Prediction of HLA-DQ3.2{beta} Ligands: evidence of multiple registers in class II binding peptides
Bioinformatics, May 15, 2006; 22(10): 1232 - 1238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
I. Doytchinova, S. Hemsley, and D. R. Flower
Transporter Associated with Antigen Processing Preselection of Peptides Binding to the MHC: A Bioinformatic Evaluation
J. Immunol., December 1, 2004; 173(11): 6813 - 6819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
I. A. Doytchinova, V. A. Walshe, N. A. Jones, S. E. Gloster, P. Borrow, and D. R. Flower
Coupling In Silico and In Vitro Analysis of Peptide-MHC Binding: A Bioinformatic Approach Enabling Prediction of Superbinding Peptides and Anchorless Epitopes
J. Immunol., June 15, 2004; 172(12): 7495 - 7502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.