Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (54)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kikuchi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tomita, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kikuchi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tomita, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 19 no. 5 2003
Pages 643-650
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Dynamic modeling of genetic networks using genetic algorithm and S-system

Shinichi Kikuchi 1,2,*, Daisuke Tominaga 1, Masanori Arita 1,2, Katsutoshi Takahashi 1 and Masaru Tomita 2

1 Computational Biology Research Center (CBRC), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2-41-6 Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-0064, Japan
2 Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, 14-1, Baba, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, 997-0035, Japan

Received on June 5, 2002 ; revised on September 20, 2002 ; accepted on September 28, 2002

Motivation: The modeling of system dynamics of genetic networks, metabolic networks or signal transduction cascades from time-course data is formulated as a reverse-problem. Previous studies focused on the estimation of only network structures, and they were ineffective in inferring a network structure with feedback loops. We previously proposed a method to predict not only the network structure but also its dynamics using a Genetic Algorithm (GA) and an S-system formalism. However, it could predict only a small number of parameters and could rarely obtain essential structures. In this work, we propose a unified extension of the basic method. Notable improvements are as follows: (1) an additional term in its evaluation function that aims at eliminating futile parameters; (2) a crossover method called Simplex Crossover (SPX) to improve its optimization ability; and (3) a gradual optimization strategy to increase the number of predictable parameters.

Results: The proposed method is implemented as a C program called PEACE1 (Predictor by Evolutionary Algorithms and Canonical Equations 1). Its performance was compared with the basic method. The comparison showed that: (1) the convergence rate increased about 5-fold; (2) the optimization speed was raised about 1.5-fold; and (3) the number of predictable parameters was increased about 5-fold. Moreover, we successfully inferred the dynamics of a small genetic network constructed with 60 parameters for 5 network variables and feedback loops using only time-course data of gene expression.

Contact: kikuchi{at}sfc.keio.ac.jp

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
F. Zhao, F. Zhao, T. Li, and D. A. Bryant
A new pheromone trail-based genetic algorithm for comparative genome assembly
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(10): 3455 - 3462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
P.-K. Liu and F.-S. Wang
Inference of biochemical network models in S-system using multiobjective optimization approach
Bioinformatics, April 15, 2008; 24(8): 1085 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
O. R. Gonzalez, C. Kuper, K. Jung, P. C. Naval Jr, and E. Mendoza
Parameter estimation using Simulated Annealing for S-system models of biochemical networks
Bioinformatics, February 15, 2007; 23(4): 480 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
D.-Y. Cho, K.-H. Cho, and B.-T. Zhang
Identification of biochemical networks by S-tree based genetic programming
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2006; 22(13): 1631 - 1640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
P. Larranaga, B. Calvo, R. Santana, C. Bielza, J. Galdiano, I. Inza, J. A. Lozano, R. Armananzas, G. Santafe, A. Perez, et al.
Machine learning in bioinformatics
Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2006; 7(1): 86 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
K.-Y. Tsai and F.-S. Wang
Evolutionary optimization with data collocation for reverse engineering of biological networks
Bioinformatics, April 1, 2005; 21(7): 1180 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. Kimura, K. Ide, A. Kashihara, M. Kano, M. Hatakeyama, R. Masui, N. Nakagawa, S. Yokoyama, S. Kuramitsu, and A. Konagaya
Inference of S-system models of genetic networks using a cooperative coevolutionary algorithm
Bioinformatics, April 1, 2005; 21(7): 1154 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
G. Liu, M. T. Swihart, and S. Neelamegham
Sensitivity, principal component and flux analysis applied to signal transduction: the case of epidermal growth factor mediated signaling
Bioinformatics, April 1, 2005; 21(7): 1194 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.