Bioinformatics Vol. 19 no. 7 2003
Pages 803-810
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Statistical design of reverse dye microarrays
National Cancer Institute, Biometric Research Branch, 6130 Executive Blvd., MSC 7434, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Received on July 25, 2002
; revised on September 26, 2002
; accepted on November 13, 2002
Motivation: In cDNA microarray experiments all samples are labelled with either Cy3 dye or Cy5 dye. Certain genes exhibit dye bias—a tendency to bind more efficiently to one of the dyes. The common reference design avoids the problem of dye bias by running all arrays ‘forward’, so that the samples being compared are always labelled with the same dye. But comparison of samples labelled with different dyes is sometimes of interest. In these situations, it is necessary to run some arrays ‘reverse’—with the dye labelling reversed—in order to correct for the dye bias. The design of these experiments will impact one’s ability to identify genes that are differentially expressed in different tissues or conditions. We address the design issue of how many specimens are needed, how many forward and reverse labelled arrays to perform, and how to optimally assign Cy3 and Cy5 labels to the specimens.
Results: We consider three types of experiments for which some reverse labelling is needed: paired samples, samples from two predefined groups, and reference design data when comparison with the reference is of interest. We present simple probability models for the data, derive optimal estimators for relative gene expression, and compare the efficiency of the estimators for a range of designs. In each case, we present the optimal design and sample size formulas. We show that reverse labelling of individual arrays is generally not required.
Contact: dobbinke{at}mail.nih.gov.
Supplementary information: Supplementary material referenced in the text is available at http://linus.nci.nih.gov/~brb/TechReport.htm
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Ponzielli, P. C. Boutros, S. Katz, A. Stojanova, A. P. Hanley, F. Khosravi, C. Bros, I. Jurisica, and L. Z. Penn Optimization of experimental design parameters for high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation studies Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2008; 36(21): e144 - e144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Hansen, M. Lange, C. Friis, G. Dionisio, P. B. Holm, and E. Vincze Antisense-mediated suppression of C-hordein biosynthesis in the barley grain results in correlated changes in the transcriptome, protein profile, and amino acid composition J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2007; 58(14): 3987 - 3995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Dubouzet, A. Ishihara, F. Matsuda, H. Miyagawa, H. Iwata, and K. Wakasa Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of high-tryptophan rice expressing a mutant anthranilate synthase alpha subunit J. Exp. Bot., September 4, 2007; (2007) erm179v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Wojcik, M. Rowicka, A. Kudlicki, D. Nowis, E. McConnell, M. Kujawa, and G. N. DeMartino Valosin-containing Protein (p97) Is a Regulator of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and of the Degradation of N-End Rule and Ubiquitin-Fusion Degradation Pathway Substrates in Mammalian Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2006; 17(11): 4606 - 4618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Nettleton A discussion of statistical methods for design and analysis of microarray experiments for plant scientists. PLANT CELL, September 1, 2006; 18(9): 2112 - 2121. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H.-P. Piepho Optimal Allocation in Designs for Assessing Heterosis From cDNA Gene Expression Data Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 359 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. K. Dobbin, J. H. Shih, and R. M. Simon Comment on 'Evaluation of the gene-specific dye bias in cDNA microarray experiments' Bioinformatics, June 15, 2005; 21(12): 2803 - 2804. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. K. Dobbin, E. S. Kawasaki, D. W. Petersen, and R. M. Simon Characterizing dye bias in microarray experiments Bioinformatics, May 15, 2005; 21(10): 2430 - 2437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Eckel-Passow, A. Hoering, T. M. Therneau, and I. Ghobrial Experimental Design and Analysis of Antibody Microarrays: Applying Methods from cDNA Arrays Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 65(8): 2985 - 2989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Mutsuga, T. Shahar, J. G. Verbalis, C. C. Xiang, M. J. Brownstein, and H. Gainer Regulation of Gene Expression in Magnocellular Neurons in Rat Supraoptic Nucleus during Sustained Hypoosmolality Endocrinology, March 1, 2005; 146(3): 1254 - 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P.J.I. Ellis, R.A. Furlong, A. Wilson, S. Morris, D. Carter, G. Oliver, C. Print, P.S. Burgoyne, K.L. Loveland, and N.A. Affara Modulation of the mouse testis transcriptome during postnatal development and in selected models of male infertility Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 10(4): 271 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. C. 't Hoen, R. Turk, J. M. Boer, E. Sterrenburg, R. X. de Menezes, G.-J. B. van Ommen, and J. T. den Dunnen Intensity-based analysis of two-colour microarrays enables efficient and flexible hybridization designs Nucleic Acids Res., February 24, 2004; 32(4): e41 - e41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. D. Irwin, G. A. Boorman, M. L. Cunningham, A. N. Heinloth, D. E. Malarkey, and R. S. Paules Application of Toxicogenomics to Toxicology: Basic Concepts in the Analysis of Microarray Data Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1_suppl): 72 - 83. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Dobbin, J. H. Shih, and R. Simon Questions and Answers on Design of Dual-Label Microarrays for Identifying Differentially Expressed Genes J Natl Cancer Inst, September 17, 2003; 95(18): 1362 - 1369. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|