Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Enault, F.
Right arrow Articles by Claverie, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Enault, F.
Right arrow Articles by Claverie, J.-M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 19 Suppl. 1 2003
Pages i105-i107
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Annotation of bacterial genomes using improved phylogenomic profiles

F. Enault *, K. Suhre , C. Abergel , O. Poirot and J.-M. Claverie

Structural and Genomic Information, CNRS - UPR 2589, 31 chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13009 Marseille, France

Received on January 6, 2003 ; accepted on February 20, 2003

Motivation: Phylogenomic profiling is a large-scale comparative genomic method used to infer protein function from evolutionary information first described in a binary form by Pellegrini et al. (1999). Here, we propose improvements of this approach including the use of normalized Blastp bit scores, a normalization of the matrix of profiles to take into account the evolutionary distances between bacteria, the definition of a phylogenomic neighborhood based on continuous pairwise distances between genes and an original annotation procedure including the computation of a p-value for each functional assignment.

Results: The method presented here increases the number of Ecocyc enzymes identified as being evolutionarily related by about 25% with respect to the original binary form (absent/present) method. The fraction of ‘false’ positives is shown to be smaller than 20%. Based on their phylogenomic relationships, genes of unknown function can then be automatically related to annotated genes. Each gene annotation predicted is associated with a p-value, i.e. its probability to be obtained by chance. The validity of this method was extensively tested on a large set of genes of known function using the MultiFun database. We find that 50% of 3122 function attributions that can be made at a p-value level of 10-11 correspond to the actual gene annotation. The method can be readily applied to any newly sequenced microbial genome. In contrast to earlier work on the same topic, our approach avoids the use of arbitrary cut-off values, and provides a reliability estimate of the functional predictions in form of p-values.

Contact: enault{at}igs.cnrs-mrs.fr

Keywords: phylogenomics, functional prediction, automated annotation, bacteria, evolution.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
S. Yellaboina, K. Goyal, and S. C. Mande
Inferring genome-wide functional linkages in E. coli by combining improved genome context methods: Comparison with high-throughput experimental data
Genome Res., April 1, 2007; 17(4): 527 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
J. Sun, J. Xu, Z. Liu, Q. Liu, A. Zhao, T. Shi, and Y. Li
Refined phylogenetic profiles method for predicting protein-protein interactions
Bioinformatics, August 15, 2005; 21(16): 3409 - 3415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
F. Enault, K. Suhre, O. Poirot, C. Abergel, and J.-M. Claverie
Phydbac2: improved inference of gene function using interactive phylogenomic profiling and chromosomal location analysis
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2004; 32(suppl_2): W336 - W339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.