Vol. 20 no. 1 2004, pages 78-84
Bioinformatics © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.
Adaptive stochastic-deterministic chemical kinetic simulations
National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, GKVK Campus, Bangalore 560065, India
Received on February 25, 2003
; revised on May 28, 2003
; accepted on July 22, 2003
Motivation: Biochemical signaling pathways and genetic circuits often involve very small numbers of key signaling molecules. Computationally expensive stochastic methods are necessary to simulate such chemical situations. Single-molecule chemical events often co-exist with much larger numbers of signaling molecules where mass-action kinetics is a reasonable approximation. Here, we describe an adaptive stochastic method that dynamically chooses between deterministic and stochastic calculations depending on molecular count and propensity of forward reactions. The method is fixed timestep and has first order accuracy. We compare the efficiency of this method with exact stochastic methods.
Results: We have implemented an adaptive stochastic-deterministic approximate simulation method for chemical kinetics. With an error margin of 5%, the method solves typical biologically constrained reaction schemes more rapidly than exact stochastic methods for reaction volumes >110 µm3. We have developed a test suite of reaction cases to test the accuracy of mixed simulation methods.
Availability: Simulation software used in the paper is freely available from http://www.ncbs.res.in/kinetikit/download.html
Supplementary information: A GENESIS/Kinetikit implementation of models and the test suite used in this paper are available from http://www.ncbs.res.in/kinetikit/download.html and also from the DOQCS database, http://doqcs.ncbs.res.in
Contact: bhalla{at}ncbs.res.in
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Kummer, B. Krajnc, J. Pahle, A. K. Green, C. J. Dixon, and M. Marhl Transition from Stochastic to Deterministic Behavior in Calcium Oscillations Biophys. J., September 1, 2005; 89(3): 1603 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pettinen, T. Aho, O.-P. Smolander, T. Manninen, A. Saarinen, K.-L. Taattola, O. Yli-Harja, and M.-L. Linne Simulation tools for biochemical networks: evaluation of performance and usability Bioinformatics, February 1, 2005; 21(3): 357 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Orrell, S. Ramsey, P. de Atauri, and H. Bolouri A method for estimating stochastic noise in large genetic regulatory networks Bioinformatics, January 15, 2005; 21(2): 208 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. S. Bhalla Signaling in Small Subcellular Volumes. I. Stochastic and Diffusion Effects on Individual Pathways Biophys. J., August 1, 2004; 87(2): 733 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. S. Bhalla Signaling in Small Subcellular Volumes. II. Stochastic and Diffusion Effects on Synaptic Network Properties Biophys. J., August 1, 2004; 87(2): 745 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Vayttaden and U. S. Bhalla Developing Complex Signaling Models Using GENESIS/Kinetikit Sci. Signal., February 10, 2004; 2004(219): pl4 - pl4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


