Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on May 14, 2004
Bioinformatics 2004 20(16):2685-2693; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth309
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bioinformatics vol. 20 issue 16 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.
Correcting log ratios for signal saturation in cDNA microarrays
1 Biometric Research Branch, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7434, USA, 2 Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, 8717 Grovemont Circle, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA and 3 Radiation Oncology Branch, CCR, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-4605, USA
Received on December 17, 2003; revised on March 15, 2004; accepted on April 28, 2004
Advance Access Publication May 14, 2004
Motivation: Pixel saturation occurs when the pixel intensity exceeds a threshold and the recorded pixel intensity is truncated. Microarray experiments are commonly afflicted with saturated pixels. As a result, estimators of gene expression are biased, with the amount of bias increasing as a function of the proportion of pixels saturated. Saturation is directly related to the photomultiplier tube (PMT) voltage settings and RNA abundance and is not necessarily associated with poor array or poor spot quality. When choosing PMT settings, higher PMT settings are desired because of improved signal-to-noise ratios of low-intensity spots. This improved signal is somewhat offset by saturation of high-intensity spots. In practice, spots with saturated pixels are discarded or the biased value is used. Neither of these approaches is appealing, particularly the former approach when a highly expressed gene is discarded because of saturation.
Results: We present a method to correct for saturation using pixel-level data. The method is based on a censored regression model. Evaluations on several arrays indicate that the method performs well. Simulation studies suggest that the method is robust under certain model violations.
Supplementary material: Supplementary tables and figures can be found at http://linus.nci.nih.gov/Data/doddl/saturation/extras.pdf
Contact: doddl{at}mail.nih.gov
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  X. Zheng, H.-C. Huang, W. Li, P. Liu, Q.-Z. Li, and Y. Liu Modeling nonlinearity in dilution design microarray data Bioinformatics, June 1, 2007; 23(11): 1339 - 1347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. Skibbe, X. Wang, X. Zhao, L. A. Borsuk, D. Nettleton, and P. S. Schnable Scanning microarrays at multiple intensities enhances discovery of differentially expressed genes Bioinformatics, August 1, 2006; 22(15): 1863 - 1870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. P. Piepho, B. Keller, N. Hoecker, and F. Hochholdinger Combining signals from spotted cDNA microarrays obtained at different scanning intensities Bioinformatics, April 1, 2006; 22(7): 802 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Fluck, C. Dapp, S. Schmutz, E. Wit, and H. Hoppeler Transcriptional profiling of tissue plasticity: role of shifts in gene expression and technical limitations J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2005; 99(2): 397 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|