Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juretic, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bruskiewich, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juretic, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bruskiewich, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Vol. 20 no. 2 2004, pages 155-160
Bioinformatics © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.


PAG Meeting Original Paper

Transposable element annotation of the rice genome

Nikoleta Juretic 1,*, Thomas E. Bureau 1 and Richard M. Bruskiewich 2

1 Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1B1 Canada and 2 Biometrics and Bioinformatics Unit, International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines

Received on November 9, 2003 ; accepted on November 11, 2003

Motivation: The high content of repetitive sequences in the genomes of many higher eukaryotes renders the task of annotating them computationally intensive. Presently, the only widely accepted method of searching and annotating transposable elements (TEs) in large genomic sequences is the use of the RepeatMasker program, which identifies new copies of TEs by pairwise sequence comparisons with a library of known TEs. Profile hidden Markov models (HMMs) have been used successfully in discovering distant homologs of known proteins in large protein databases, but this approach has only rarely been applied to known model TE families in genomic DNA.

Results: We used a combination of computational approaches to annotate the TEs in the finished genome of Oryza sativa ssp. japonica. In this paper, we discuss the strengths and the weaknesses of the annotation methods used. These approaches included: the default configuration of RepeatMasker using cross_match, an implementation of the Smith–Waterman–Gotoh algorithm; RepeatMasker using WU-BLAST for similarity searching; and the HMMER package, used to search for TEs with profile HMMs. All the results were converted into GFF format and post-processed using a set of Perl scripts.

RepeatMasker was used in the case of most TE families. The WU-BLAST implementation of RepeatMasker was found to be manifold faster than cross_match with only a slight loss in sensitivity and was thus used to obtain the final set of data. HMMER was used in the annotation of the Mutator-like element (MULE) superfamily and the miniature inverted-repeat transposable element (MITE) polyphyletic group of families, for which large libraries of elements were available and which could be divided into well-defined families. The HMMER search algorithm was extremely slow for models over 1000 bp in length, so MULE families with members over 1000 bp long were processed with RepeatMasker instead. The main disadvantage of HMMER in this application is that, since it was developed with protein sequences in mind, it does not search the negative DNA strand. With the exception of TE families with essentially palindromic sequences, reverse complement models had to be created and run to compensate for this shortcoming. We conclude that a modification of RepeatMasker to incorporate libraries of profile HMMs in searches could improve the ability to detect degenerated copies of TEs.

Availability: The Perl scripts and TE sequences used in construction of the RepeatMasker library and the profile HMMs are available upon request.

Contact: njuret{at}po-box.mcgill.ca

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. L. McNally, K. L. Childs, R. Bohnert, R. M. Davidson, K. Zhao, V. J. Ulat, G. Zeller, R. M. Clark, D. R. Hoen, T. E. Bureau, et al.
Genomewide SNP variation reveals relationships among landraces and modern varieties of rice
PNAS, July 28, 2009; 106(30): 12273 - 12278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
H. Kuang, C. Padmanabhan, F. Li, A. Kamei, P. B. Bhaskar, S. Ouyang, J. Jiang, C. R. Buell, and B. Baker
Identification of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and biogenesis of their siRNAs in the Solanaceae: New functional implications for MITEs
Genome Res., January 1, 2009; 19(1): 42 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Plant GenomeHome page
B. Han and Q. Zhang
Rice Genome Research: Current Status and Future Perspectives
The Plant Genome, November 1, 2008; 1(2): 71 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
X. Huang, G. Lu, Q. Zhao, X. Liu, and B. Han
Genome-Wide Analysis of Transposon Insertion Polymorphisms Reveals Intraspecific Variation in Cultivated Rice
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2008; 148(1): 25 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
C. M. Bergman and H. Quesneville
Discovering and detecting transposable elements in genome sequences
Brief Bioinform, November 1, 2007; 8(6): 382 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
F.-C. Chen, S.-S. Wang, S.-M. Chaw, Y.-T. Huang, and T.-J. Chuang
Plant Gene and Alternatively Spliced Variant Annotator. A Plant Genome Annotation Pipeline for Rice Gene and Alternatively Spliced Variant Identification with Cross-Species Expressed Sequence Tag Conservation from Seven Plant Species
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2007; 143(3): 1086 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Holligan, X. Zhang, N. Jiang, E. J. Pritham, and S. R. Wessler
The Transposable Element Landscape of the Model Legume Lotus japonicus
Genetics, December 1, 2006; 174(4): 2215 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. Tempel, M. Giraud, D. Lavenier, I.-C. Lerman, A.-S. Valin, I. Couee, A. E. Amrani, and J. Nicolas
Domain organization within repeated DNA sequences: application to the study of a family of transposable elements
Bioinformatics, August 15, 2006; 22(16): 1948 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. Toth, G. Deak, E. Barta, and G. B. Kiss
PLOTREP: a web tool for defragmentation and visual analysis of dispersed genomic repeats.
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2006; 34(Web Server issue): W708 - W713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
N. Juretic, D. R. Hoen, M. L. Huynh, P. M. Harrison, and T. E. Bureau
The evolutionary fate of MULE-mediated duplications of host gene fragments in rice
Genome Res., September 1, 2005; 15(9): 1292 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
Q. Yuan, S. Ouyang, A. Wang, W. Zhu, R. Maiti, H. Lin, J. Hamilton, B. Haas, R. Sultana, F. Cheung, et al.
The Institute for Genomic Research Osa1 Rice Genome Annotation Database
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2005; 138(1): 18 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.