Vol. 20 no. 2 2004, pages 206-215
Bioinformatics Published by Oxford University Press
Comparative evaluation of word composition distances for the recognition of SCOP relationships
1 Biomathematics Group, ITQB, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Quinta Grande, n. 6, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal and 2 Department Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical University South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 303, P.O. Box 250835, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
Received on April 23, 2003
; revised on June 27, 2003
; accepted on July 11, 2003
Motivation: Alignment-free metrics were recently reviewed by the authors, but have not until now been object of a comparative study. This paper compares the classification accuracy of word composition metrics therein reviewed. It also presents a new distance definition between protein sequences, the W-metric, which bridges between alignment metrics, such as scores produced by the SmithWaterman algorithm, and methods based solely in L-tuple composition, such as Euclidean distance and Information content.
Results: The comparative study reported here used the SCOP/ASTRAL protein structure hierarchical database and accessed the discriminant value of alternative sequence dissimilarity measures by calculating areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. Although alignment methods resulted in very good classification accuracy at family and superfamily levels, alignment-free distances, in particular Standard Euclidean Distance, are as good as alignment algorithms when sequence similarity is smaller, such as for recognition of fold or class relationships. This observation justifies its advantageous use to pre-filter homologous proteins since word statistics techniques are computed much faster than the alignment methods.
Availability: All MATLAB code used to generate the data is available upon request to the authors. Additional material available at http://bioinformatics.musc.edu/wmetric
Contact: svinga{at}itqb.unl.pt; almeidaj{at}musc.edu
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Stojmirovic, E. M. Gertz, S. F. Altschul, and Y.-K. Yu The effectiveness of position- and composition-specific gap costs for protein similarity searches Bioinformatics, July 1, 2008; 24(13): i15 - i23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kocsor, A. Kertesz-Farkas, L. Kajan, and S. Pongor Application of compression-based distance measures to protein sequence classification: a methodological study Bioinformatics, February 15, 2006; 22(4): 407 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
