Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Enosh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Enosh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Halperin, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics 20(Suppl. 1) © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

Assigning transmembrane segments to helices in intermediate-resolution structures

Angela Enosh 1,*, Sarel J. Fleishman 2, Nir Ben-Tal 2 and Dan Halperin 1

1 School of Computer Science and 2 Department of Biochemistry, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978, Israel

Received on January 15, 2004; accepted on March 1, 2004

Motivation: Transmembrane (TM) proteins that form {alpha}-helix bundles constitute approximately 50% of contemporary drug targets. Yet, it is difficult to determine their high-resolution (< 4 Å) structures. Some TM proteins yield more easily to structure determination using cryo electron microscopy (cryo-EM), though this technique most often results in lower resolution structures, precluding an unambiguous assignment of TM amino acid sequences to the helices seen in the structure. We present computational tools for assigning the TM segments in the protein's sequence to the helices seen in cryo-EM structures.

Results: The method examines all feasible TM helix assignments and ranks each one based on a score function that was derived from loops in the structures of soluble {alpha}-helix bundles. A set of the most likely assignments is then suggested. We tested the method on eight TM chains of known structures, such as bacteriorhodopsin and the lactose permease. Our results indicate that many assignments can be rejected at the outset, since they involve the connection of pairs of remotely placed TM helices. The correct assignment received a high score, and was ranked highly among the remaining assignments. For example, in the lactose permease, which contains 12 TM helices, most of which are connected by short loops, only 12 out of 479 million assignments were found to be feasible, and the native one was ranked first.

Availability: The program and the non-redundant set of protein structures used here are available at http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~angela

Contact: angela{at}post.tau.ac.il

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
A. Enosh, S. J. Fleishman, N. Ben-Tal, and D. Halperin
Prediction and simulation of motion in pairs of transmembrane {alpha}-helices
Bioinformatics, January 15, 2007; 23(2): e212 - e218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.