Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on March 3, 2005
Bioinformatics 2005 21(10):2191-2199; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti368
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/10/2191    most recent
bti368v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lancashire, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ball, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lancashire, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ball, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Classification of bacterial species from proteomic data using combinatorial approaches incorporating artificial neural networks, cluster analysis and principal components analysis

L. Lancashire 1,2, O. Schmid 3, H. Shah 3 and G. Ball 1,2,*

1The Nottingham Trent University Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK
2Loreus Ltd., School of Biomedical and Natural Sciences Clifton Campus, Clifton Lane, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK
3Molecular Identification Services Unit, Central Public Health Laboratory Health Protection Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5HT, UK

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Motivation: Robust computer algorithms are required to interpret the vast amounts of proteomic data currently being produced and to generate generalized models which are applicable to ‘real world’ scenarios. One such scenario is the classification of bacterial species. These vary immensely, some remaining remarkably stable whereas others are extremely labile showing rapid mutation and change. Such variation makes clinical diagnosis difficult and pathogens may be easily misidentified.

Results: We applied artificial neural networks (Neuroshell 2) in parallel with cluster analysis and principal components analysis to surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI)-TOF mass spectrometry data with the aim of accurately identifying the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis from species within this genus and other closely related taxa. A subset of ions were identified that allowed for the consistent identification of species, classifying >97% of a separate validation subset of samples into their respective groups.

Availability: Neuroshell 2 is commercially available from Ward Systems.

Contact: graham.balls{at}ntu.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Med MicrobiolHome page
O. Schmid, G. Ball, L. Lancashire, R. Culak, and H. Shah
New approaches to identification of bacterial pathogens by surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry in concert with artificial neural networks, with special reference to Neisseria gonorrhoeae
J. Med. Microbiol., December 1, 2005; 54(12): 1205 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.