Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on May 12, 2005
Bioinformatics 2005 21(14):3155-3163; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti491
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/14/3155    most recent
bti491v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karasavvas, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Burger, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karasavvas, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Burger, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

A criticality-based framework for task composition in multi-agent bioinformatics integration systems

Konstantinos A. Karasavvas 1,*, Richard Baldock 2 and Albert Burger 1,2

1School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
2Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Motivation: During task composition, such as can be found in distributed query processing, workflow systems and AI planning, decisions have to be made by the system and possibly by users with respect to how a given problem should be solved. Although there is often more than one correct way of solving a given problem, these multiple solutions do not necessarily lead to the same result. Some researchers are addressing this problem by providing data provenance information. Others use expert advice encoded in a supporting knowledge-base. In this paper, we propose an approach that assesses the importance of such decisions with respect to the overall result. We present a way of measuring decision criticality and describe its potential use.

Results: A multi-agent bioinformatics integration system is used as the basis of a framework that facilitates such functionality. We propose an agent architecture, and a concrete bioinformatics example (prototype) is used to show how certain decisions may not be critical in the context of more complex tasks.

Contact: ceekk{at}macs.hw.ac.uk

Received on May 26, 2004; revised on April 12, 2005; accepted on May 6, 2005

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Brief BioinformHome page
E. Merelli, G. Armano, N. Cannata, F. Corradini, M. d'Inverno, A. Doms, P. Lord, A. Martin, L. Milanesi, S. Moller, et al.
Agents in bioinformatics, computational and systems biology
Brief Bioinform, January 1, 2007; 8(1): 45 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.