Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on August 16, 2005
Bioinformatics 2005 21(20):3918-3925; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti633
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oligonucleotide properties determination and primer designing: a critical examination of predictions
1Functional Genomics Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, CSIR Mall Road, Delhi 110 007, India
2Proteomics and Structural Biology Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, CSIR Mall Road, Delhi 110 007, India
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: Precise prediction of melting temperature (Tm), secondary structures and design of oligonucleotides determine the efficiency and success of experimentation in molecular biology. Availability of a plethora of software and the users unawareness about their limitations compromises the accuracy and reliability of the predictions.
Results: Comparative analysis of 56 modules was done for Tm prediction using a large set of oligonucleotide sequences spanning the whole range of GC-content and length. Allawi module of the calculator MELTING, Nearest Neighbor (NN) of oligo calculator (McLab), NN of Tm Calculation for Oligos (Biomath Calculator, Promega) and HYTHER provided the most precise Tm predictions. A model has also been proposed to calculate the optimum annealing temperature integrating the already reported formulations. Secondary structure predictions of oligonucleotides reveal a large number of structures in contrast to the experimental observations. Of the 11 primer designing tools evaluated, Primer 3 and WebPrimer performed the best for the AT-rich templates, Exon Primer for AT = GC templates, and Primer Design Assistant, Primer3 and Primer Quest for GC-rich templates. This study provides optimal choice for application to the user, increasing the success of a variety of experimentations, especially those that have high-throughput and complex assay designs.
Contact: db{at}igib.res.in
Supplementary Information: The details of the oligonucleotides and of the different modules of Tm prediction considered for the study are provided as Supplementary Information, available at Bioinformatics online.
Received on April 20, 2005; revised on August 14, 2005; accepted on August 15, 2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Croce, F. Chevenet, and R. Christen OligoHeatMap (OHM): an online tool to estimate and display hybridizations of oligonucleotides onto DNA sequences Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(suppl_2): W154 - W156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Andreson, T. Mols, and M. Remm Predicting failure rate of PCR in large genomes Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(11): e66 - e66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Koressaar and M. Remm Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3 Bioinformatics, May 15, 2007; 23(10): 1289 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Brukner, R. El-Ramahi, I. Gorska-Flipot, M. Krajinovic, and D. Labuda An in vitro selection scheme for oligonucleotide probes to discriminate between closely related DNA sequences Nucleic Acids Res., May 14, 2007; 35(9): e66 - e66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

