Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on October 18, 2005
Bioinformatics 2005 21(24):4401-4407; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti718
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Representations of molecular pathways: an evaluation of SBML, PSI MI and BioPAX
Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköpings universitet S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: Analysis and simulation of pathway data is of high importance in bioinformatics. Standards for representation of information about pathways are necessary for integration and analysis of data from various sources. Recently, a number of representation formats for pathway data, SBML, PSI MI and BioPAX, have been proposed.
Results: In this paper we compare these formats and evaluate them with respect to their underlying models, information content and possibilities for easy creation of tools. The evaluation shows that the main structure of the formats is similar. However, SBML is tuned towards simulation models of molecular pathways while PSI MI is more suitable for representing details about particular interactions and experiments. BioPAX is the most general and expressive of the formats. These differences are apparent in allowed information and the structure for representation of interactions. We discuss the impact of these differences both with respect to information content in existing databases and computational properties for import and analysis of data.
Contact: lestr{at}ida.liu.se
Received on December 16, 2004; revised on August 29, 2005; accepted on October 13, 2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Zinovyev, E. Viara, L. Calzone, and E. Barillot BiNoM: a Cytoscape plugin for manipulating and analyzing biological networks Bioinformatics, March 15, 2008; 24(6): 876 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. GONG and Z. ZHANG CellFrame: A Data Structure for Abstraction of Cell Biology Experiments and Construction of Perturbation Networks Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2007; 1115(1): 249 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wierling, R. Herwig, and H. Lehrach Resources, standards and tools for systems biology Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, October 17, 2007; (2007) elm027v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Suderman and M. Hallett Tools for visually exploring biological networks Bioinformatics, October 15, 2007; 23(20): 2651 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Berger, R. Iyengar, and A. Ma'ayan AVIS: AJAX viewer of interactive signaling networks Bioinformatics, October 15, 2007; 23(20): 2803 - 2805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Srinivasan, N. H. Shah, J. A. Flannick, E. Abeliuk, A. F. Novak, and S. Batzoglou Current progress in network research: toward reference networks for key model organisms Brief Bioinform, September 1, 2007; 8(5): 318 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Stromback, V. Jakoniene, H. Tan, and P. Lambrix Representing, storing and accessing molecular interaction data: a review of models and tools Brief Bioinform, December 1, 2006; 7(4): 331 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Green and P. D. Karp The outcomes of pathway database computations depend on pathway ontology Nucleic Acids Res., August 7, 2006; 34(13): 3687 - 3697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




