Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on September 3, 2004
Bioinformatics 2005 21(3):333-337; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/333    most recent
bti008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Saiz-Jimenez, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Saiz-Jimenez, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics vol. 21 issue 3 © Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved.

Evaluating putative chimeric sequences from PCR-amplified products

Juan M. Gonzalez *, Johannes Zimmermann and Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez

Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia, CSIC Apartado 1052, 41080 Sevilla, Spain

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Motivation: PCR amplification of highly homologous genes from complex DNA mixtures is known to generate a significant proportion of chimeric sequences. Ribosomal RNA genes are used for microbial species detection and identification in natural environments, and current assessments of microbial diversity are based on these sequences. Thus, chimeric sequences could lead to the discovery of non-existent microbial species and false diversity estimates.

Methods: In essence, our only source of information to decide if a sequence is chimeric or not is to compare it with known, non-chimeric sequences. Putative chimeric sequences were analyzed from sequence fragments of selected length (referred to as words) by comparing nucleotides at corresponding positions. Distances for each word between reference sequences (closely related to the tested sequence) were compared to the differences introduced by the tested sequence. The proposed strategy considers the actual variability existing in different regions throughout the analyzed sequences. The result is an efficient strategy for the evaluation of putative chimeric sequences.

Availability: A program computing the above procedure, Chimera and Cross-Over Detection and Evaluation (Ccode), is available at http://www.irnase.csic.es/users/jmgrau/index.html and http://www.rtphc.csic.es/download.html

Contact: jmgrau{at}irnase.csic.es


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Li, B. Wang, M. Zhang, M. Rantalainen, S. Wang, H. Zhou, Y. Zhang, J. Shen, X. Pang, M. Zhang, et al.
Symbiotic gut microbes modulate human metabolic phenotypes
PNAS, February 12, 2008; 105(6): 2117 - 2122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
D. Ghosh, K. Roy, K. E. Williamson, D. C. White, K. E. Wommack, K. L. Sublette, and M. Radosevich
Prevalence of Lysogeny among Soil Bacteria and Presence of 16S rRNA and trzN Genes in Viral-Community DNA
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 15, 2008; 74(2): 495 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
K. E. Ashelford, N. A. Chuzhanova, J. C. Fry, A. J. Jones, and A. J. Weightman
At Least 1 in 20 16S rRNA Sequence Records Currently Held in Public Repositories Is Estimated To Contain Substantial Anomalies
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2005; 71(12): 7724 - 7736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.