Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on September 16, 2004
Bioinformatics 2005 21(4):492-501; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti022
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bioinformatics vol. 21 issue 4 © Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved.
An experimental evaluation of a loop versus a reference design for two-channel microarrays


1 Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK
2 Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow Glasgow G11 8QW, UK
3 Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Aston University Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
4 School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
5 Virus Genomics and Bioinformatics Group, Department of Infection, University College London London W1T 4JF, UK
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: Despite theoretical arguments that so-called loop designs for two-channel DNA microarray experiments are more efficient, biologists continue to use reference designs. We describe two sets of microarray experiments with RNA from two different biological systems (TPA-stimulated mammalian cells and Streptomyces coelicolor). In each case, both a loop and a reference design were used with the same RNA preparations with the aim of studying their relative efficiency.
Results: The results of these experiments show that (1) the loop design attains a much higher precision than the reference design, (2) multiplicative spot effects are a large source of variability, and if they are not accounted for in the mathematical model, for example, by taking log-ratios or including spot effects, then the model will perform poorly. The first result is reinforced by a simulation study. Practical recommendations are given on how simple loop designs can be extended to more realistic experimental designs and how standard statistical methods allow the experimentalist to use and interpret the results from loop designs in practice.
Availability: The data and R code are available at http://exgen.ma.umist.ac.uk
Contact: veronica.vinciotti{at}brunel.ac.uk
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Verdugo, C. F. Deschepper, G. Munoz, D. Pomp, and G. A. Churchill Importance of randomization in microarray experimental designs with Illumina platforms Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2009; 37(17): 5610 - 5618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Azcarate-Peril, R. Tallon, and T. R. Klaenhammer Temporal gene expression and probiotic attributes of Lactobacillus acidophilus during growth in milk J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2009; 92(3): 870 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S.Q. Kortenhorst, M. Zahurak, S. Shabbeer, S. Kachhap, N. Galloway, G. Parmigiani, H. M.W. Verheul, and M. A. Carducci A Multiple-Loop, Double-Cube Microarray Design Applied to Prostate Cancer Cell Lines with Variable Sensitivity to Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 6886 - 6894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Borodina, J. Siebring, J. Zhang, C. P. Smith, G. van Keulen, L. Dijkhuizen, and J. Nielsen Antibiotic Overproduction in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) Mediated by Phosphofructokinase Deletion J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2008; 283(37): 25186 - 25199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cordero, M. Botta, and R. A. Calogero Microarray data analysis and mining approaches Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, January 22, 2008; (2008) elm034v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Tian, T. Kasuga, M. S. Sachs, and N. L. Glass Transcriptional Profiling of Cross Pathway Control in Neurospora crassa and Comparative Analysis of the Gcn4 and CPC1 Regulons Eukaryot. Cell, June 1, 2007; 6(6): 1018 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. M. Rosa, N. de Leon, and A. J. M. Rosa Review of microarray experimental design strategies for genetical genomics studies Physiol Genomics, December 13, 2006; 28(1): 15 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wintz, L. J. Yoo, A. Loguinov, Y.-Y. Wu, J. A. Steevens, R. D. Holland, R. D. Beger, E. J. Perkins, O. Hughes, and C. D. Vulpe Gene Expression Profiles in Fathead Minnow Exposed to 2,4-DNT: Correlation with Toxicity in Mammals Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2006; 94(1): 71 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lo, D. M. Bulach, D. R. Powell, D. A. Haake, J. Matsunaga, M. L. Paustian, R. L. Zuerner, and B. Adler Effects of Temperature on Gene Expression Patterns in Leptospira interrogans Serovar Lai as Assessed by Whole-Genome Microarrays. Infect. Immun., October 1, 2006; 74(10): 5848 - 5859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. S. B. Filho, S. G. Gilmour, and G. J. M. Rosa Design of Microarray Experiments for Genetical Genomics Studies Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 945 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kasuga, J. P. Townsend, C. Tian, L. B. Gilbert, G. Mannhaupt, J. W. Taylor, and N. L. Glass Long-oligomer microarray profiling in Neurospora crassa reveals the transcriptional program underlying biochemical and physiological events of conidial germination Nucleic Acids Res., November 14, 2005; 33(20): 6469 - 6485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||









