Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2004
Bioinformatics 2005 21(5):660-668; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti063
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate
INSERM U472, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94807 Villejuif Cedex, France
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: The most used criterion in microarray data analysis is nowadays the false discovery rate (FDR). In the framework of estimating procedures based on the marginal distribution of the P-values without any assumption on gene expression changes, estimators of the FDR are necessarily conservatively biased. Indeed, only an upper bound estimate can be obtained for the key quantity
0, which is the probability for a gene to be unmodified. In this paper, we propose a novel family of estimators for
0 that allows the calculation of FDR.
Results: The very simple method for estimating
0 called LBE (Location Based Estimator) is presented together with results on its variability. Simulation results indicate that the proposed estimator performs well in finite sample and has the best mean square error in most of the cases as compared with the procedures QVALUE, BUM and SPLOSH. The different procedures are then applied to real datasets.
Availability: The R function LBE is available at http://ifr69.vjf.inserm.fr/lbe
Contact: broet{at}vjf.inserm.fr
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Lai A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data Biostat., October 1, 2007; 8(4): 744 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Broet, V. A. Kuznetsov, J. Bergh, E. T. Liu, and L. D. Miller Identifying gene expression changes in breast cancer that distinguish early and late relapse among uncured patients Bioinformatics, June 15, 2006; 22(12): 1477 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Gao Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments Bioinformatics, June 15, 2006; 22(12): 1486 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ploner, S. Calza, A. Gusnanto, and Y. Pawitan Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies Bioinformatics, March 1, 2006; 22(5): 556 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xie, W. Pan, and A. B. Khodursky A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data Bioinformatics, December 1, 2005; 21(23): 4280 - 4288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Pawitan, K. R. K. Murthy, S. Michiels, and A. Ploner Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies Bioinformatics, October 15, 2005; 21(20): 3865 - 3872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Mazzella, M. V. Arana, R. J. Staneloni, S. Perelman, M. J. Rodriguez Batiller, J. Muschietti, P. D. Cerdan, K. Chen, R. A. Sanchez, T. Zhu, et al. Phytochrome Control of the Arabidopsis Transcriptome Anticipates Seedling Exposure to Light PLANT CELL, September 1, 2005; 17(9): 2507 - 2516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


