Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on February 10, 2006
Bioinformatics 2006 22(10):1190-1197; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl041
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Composite Module Analyst: a fitness-based tool for identification of transcription factor binding site combinations
1 BIOBASE GmbH Halchtersche Str. 33, D-38304 Wolfenbüttel, Germany
2 Institute of Cytology and Genetics Novosibirsk, Russia
3 A. P. Ershov's Institute of Informatics Systems 6, Lavrentiev avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
4 Department of Bioinformatics, UKG/University Göttingen Goldschmidsdtstr. 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: Functionally related genes involved in the same molecular-genetic, biochemical or physiological process are often regulated coordinately. Such regulation is provided by precisely organized binding of a multiplicity of special proteins [transcription factors (TFs)] to their target sites (cis-elements) in regulatory regions of genes. Cis-element combinations provide a structural basis for the generation of unique patterns of gene expression.
Results: Here we present a new approach for defining promoter models based on the composition of TF binding sites and their pairs. We utilize a multicomponent fitness function for selection of the promoter model that fits best to the observed gene expression profile. We demonstrate examples of successful application of the fitness function with the help of a genetic algorithm for the analysis of functionally related or co-expressed genes as well as testing on simulated and permutated data.
Availability: The CMA program is freely available for non-commercial users. URL http://www.gene-regulation.com/pub/programs.html#CMAnalyst. It is also a part of the commercial system ExPlainTM (www.biobase.de) designed for causal analysis of gene expression data.
Contact: alexander.kel{at}biobase-international.com
Received on November 30, 2005; revised on January 9, 2006; accepted on February 3, 2006
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Narlikar and I. Ovcharenko Identifying regulatory elements in eukaryotic genomes Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, July 1, 2009; 8(4): 215 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bulow, S. Engelmann, M. Schindler, and R. Hehl AthaMap, integrating transcriptional and post-transcriptional data Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2009; 37(suppl_1): D983 - D986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Michael, J. Hogan, A. Kel, O. Kel-Margoulis, F. Schacherer, N. Voss, and E. Wingender Building a knowledge base for systems pathology Brief Bioinform, December 10, 2008; (2008) bbn038v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hu, H. Hu, and X. Li MOPAT: a graph-based method to predict recurrent cis-regulatory modules from known motifs Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2008; 36(13): 4488 - 4497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Wingender The TRANSFAC project as an example of framework technology that supports the analysis of genomic regulation Brief Bioinform, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 326 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cordero, M. Botta, and R. A. Calogero Microarray data analysis and mining approaches Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, January 22, 2008; (2008) elm034v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. J. Donaldson and B. Gottgens CoMoDis: composite motif discovery in mammalian genomes Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(1): e1 - e1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Keller, S. Addya, R. Vadigepalli, B. Banini, K. Delgrosso, H. Huang, and S. Surrey Transcriptional regulatory network analysis of developing human erythroid progenitors reveals patterns of coregulation and potential transcriptional regulators Physiol Genomics, December 13, 2006; 28(1): 114 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



