Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on March 30, 2006
Bioinformatics 2006 22(12):1486-1494; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl109
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/12/1486    most recent
btl109v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gao, X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gao, X.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments

Xin Gao

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Motivation: The parametric F-test has been widely used in the analysis of factorial microarray experiments to assess treatment effects. However, the normality assumption is often untenable for microarray experiments with small replications. Therefore, permutation-based methods are called for help to assess the statistical significance. The distribution of the F-statistics across all the genes on the array can be regarded as a mixture distribution with a proportion of statistics generated from the null distribution of no differential gene expression whereas the other proportion of statistics generated from the alternative distribution of genes differentially expressed. This results in the fact that the permutation distribution of the F-statistics may not approximate well to the true null distribution of the F-statistics. Therefore, the construction of a proper null statistic to better approximate the null distribution of F-statistic is of great importance to the permutation-based multiple testing in microarray data analysis.

Results: In this paper, we extend the ideas of constructing null statistics based on pairwise differences to neglect the treatment effects from the two-sample comparison problem to the multifactorial balanced or unbalanced microarray experiments. A null statistic based on a subpartition method is proposed and its distribution is employed to approximate the null distribution of the F-statistic. The proposed null statistic is able to accommodate unbalance in the design and is also corrected for the undue correlation between its numerator and denominator. In the simulation studies and real biological data analysis, the number of true positives and the false discovery rate (FDR) of the proposed null statistic are compared with those of the permutated version of the F-statistic. It has been shown that our proposed method has a better control of the FDRs and a higher power than the standard permutation method to detect differentially expressed genes because of the better approximated tail probabilities.

Availability: R codes available upon request

Contact: xingao{at}mathstat.yorku.ca


Received on December 14, 2005; revised on February 28, 2006; accepted on March 19, 2006

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
J. Xu and X. Cui
Robustified MANOVA with applications in detecting differentially expressed genes from oligonucleotide arrays
Bioinformatics, April 15, 2008; 24(8): 1056 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.