Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on April 27, 2006
Bioinformatics 2006 22(14):1730-1736; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl161
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/14/1730    most recent
btl161v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jung, S.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Jang, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jung, S.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Jang, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

How accurately can we control the FDR in analyzing microarray data?

Sin-Ho Jung 1,* and Woncheol Jang 2

1 Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University NC 27710, USA
2 Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences, Duke University NC 27705, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Summary: We want to evaluate the performance of two FDR-based multiple testing procedures by Benjamini and Hochberg (1995, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 57, 289–300) and Storey (2002, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 64, 479–498) in analyzing real microarray data. These procedures commonly require independence or weak dependence of the test statistics. However, expression levels of different genes from each array are usually correlated due to coexpressing genes and various sources of errors from experiment-specific and subject-specific conditions that are not adjusted for in data analysis. Because of high dimensionality of microarray data, it is usually impossible to check whether the weak dependence condition is met for a given dataset or not. We propose to generate a large number of test statistics from a simulation model which has asymptotically (in terms of the number of arrays) the same correlation structure as the test statistics that will be calculated from the given data and to investigate how accurately the FDR-based testing procedures control the FDR on the simulated data. Our approach is to directly check the performance of these procedures for a given dataset, rather than to check the weak dependency requirement. We illustrate the proposed method with real microarray datasets, one where the clinical endpoint is disease group and another where it is survival.

Contact: jung0005{at}mc.duke.edu


Received on December 5, 2005; revised on April 11, 2006; accepted on April 23, 2006

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. C. Kaizer, C. L. Glaser, D. Chaussabel, J. Banchereau, V. Pascual, and P. C. White
Gene Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Children with Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 3705 - 3711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
T. S. Mehta, S. O. Zakharkin, G. L. Gadbury, and D. B. Allison
Epistemological issues in omics and high-dimensional biology: give the people what they want
Physiol Genomics, December 13, 2006; 28(1): 24 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.