Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on July 4, 2006
Bioinformatics 2006 22(17):2107-2113; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl361
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/17/2107    most recent
btl361v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Rattray, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Rattray, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Probe-level measurement error improves accuracy in detecting differential gene expression

Xuejun Liu 1, Marta Milo 2, Neil D Lawrence 2 and Magnus Rattray 1,*

1 School of Computer Science, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
2 Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield Regent Court 211 Portobello Street, Sheffield S1 4DP, UK

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Motivation: Finding differentially expressed genes is a fundamental objective of a microarray experiment. Numerous methods have been proposed to perform this task. Existing methods are based on point estimates of gene expression level obtained from each microarray experiment. This approach discards potentially useful information about measurement error that can be obtained from an appropriate probe-level analysis. Probabilistic probe-level models can be used to measure gene expression and also provide a level of uncertainty in this measurement. This probe-level measurement error provides useful information which can help in the identification of differentially expressed genes.

Results: We propose a Bayesian method to include probe-level measurement error into the detection of differentially expressed genes from replicated experiments. A variational approximation is used for efficient parameter estimation. We compare this approximation with MAP and MCMC parameter estimation in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy. The method is used to calculate the probability of positive log-ratio (PPLR) of expression levels between conditions. Using the measurements from a recently developed Affymetrix probe-level model, multi-mgMOS, we test PPLR on a spike-in dataset and a mouse time-course dataset. Results show that the inclusion of probe-level measurement error improves accuracy in detecting differential gene expression.

Availability: The MAP approximation and variational inference described in this paper have been implemented in an R package pplr. The MCMC method is implemented in Matlab. Both software are available from http://umber.sbs.man.ac.uk/resources/puma

Contact: magnus.rattray{at}manchester.ac.uk

Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Online.

Received on March 30, 2006; revised on June 5, 2006; accepted on June 26, 2006

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Physiol. GenomicsHome page
D. G. Morris, S. M. Waters, S. D. McCarthy, J. Patton, B. Earley, R. Fitzpatrick, J. J. Murphy, M. G. Diskin, D. A. Kenny, A. Brass, et al.
Pleiotropic effects of negative energy balance in the postpartum dairy cow on splenic gene expression: repercussions for innate and adaptive immunity
Physiol Genomics, September 1, 2009; 39(1): 28 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Physiol. GenomicsHome page
I. M. Packham, C. Gray, P. R. Heath, P. G. Hellewell, P. W. Ingham, D. C. Crossman, M. Milo, and T. J. A. Chico
Microarray profiling reveals CXCR4a is downregulated by blood flow in vivo and mediates collateral formation in zebrafish embryos
Physiol Genomics, August 7, 2009; 38(3): 319 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
P. Geeleher, D. Morris, J. P. Hinde, and A. Golden
BioconductorBuntu: a Linux distribution that implements a web-based DNA microarray analysis server
Bioinformatics, June 1, 2009; 25(11): 1438 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
B. Jayawardhana, D. B. Kell, and M. Rattray
Bayesian inference of the sites of perturbations in metabolic pathways via Markov chain Monte Carlo
Bioinformatics, May 1, 2008; 24(9): 1191 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
J. B. Silkworth, E. A. Carlson, C. McCulloch, K. Illouz, S. Goodwin, and T. R. Sutter
Toxicogenomic Analysis of Gender, Chemical, and Dose Effects in Livers of TCDD- or Aroclor 1254-Exposed Rats Using a Multifactor Linear Model
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2008; 102(2): 291 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.