Skip Navigation

Bioinformatics 2007 23(13):i282-i288; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm201
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Califano, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Califano, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comparative analysis of microarray normalization procedures: effects on reverse engineering gene networks

Wei Keat Lim 1,2, Kai Wang 1,2, Celine Lefebvre 2 and Andrea Califano 1,2,*

1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622 West 168th Street, Vanderbilt Clinic 5th Floor and 2Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Columbia University, 1130 Saint Nicholas Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Motivation: An increasingly common application of gene expression profile data is the reverse engineering of cellular networks. However, common procedures to normalize expression profiles generated using the Affymetrix GeneChips technology were originally developed for a rather different purpose, namely the accurate measure of differential gene expression between two or more phenotypes. As a result, current evaluation strategies lack comprehensive metrics to assess the suitability of available normalization procedures for reverse engineering and, in general, for measuring correlation between the expression profiles of a gene pair.

Results: We benchmark four commonly used normalization procedures (MAS5, RMA, GCRMA and Li-Wong) in the context of established algorithms for the reverse engineering of protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions. Replicate sample, randomized and human B-cell data sets are used as an input. Surprisingly, our study suggests that MAS5 provides the most faithful cellular network reconstruction. Furthermore, we identify a crucial step in GCRMA responsible for introducing severe artifacts in the data leading to a systematic overestimate of pairwise correlation. This has key implications not only for reverse engineering but also for other methods, such as hierarchical clustering, relying on accurate measurements of pairwise expression profile correlation. We propose an alternative implementation to eliminate such side effect.

Contect: califano{at}c2b2.columbia.edu



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DNA ResHome page
T. Obayashi and K. Kinoshita
Rank of Correlation Coefficient as a Comparable Measure for Biological Significance of Gene Coexpression
DNA Res, October 1, 2009; 16(5): 249 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
F. Cordero, M. Botta, and R. A. Calogero
Microarray data analysis and mining approaches
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, January 22, 2008; (2008) elm034v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.