Skip Navigation

Bioinformatics 2007 23(2):e198-e204; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl326
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Listgarten, J.
Right arrow Articles by Emili, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Listgarten, J.
Right arrow Articles by Emili, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Proteomics

Difference detection in LC-MS data for protein biomarker discovery

Jennifer Listgarten 1,*, Radford M. Neal 1,2, Sam T. Roweis 1, Peter Wong 3 and Andrew Emili 3,4

1 Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G4, Canada
2 Department of Statistics, University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G4, Canada
3 Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G4, Canada
4 Program in Proteomics and Bioinformatics, University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G4, Canada

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Motivation: There is a pressing need for improved proteomic screening methods allowing for earlier diagnosis of disease, systematic monitoring of physiological responses and the uncovering of fundamental mechanisms of drug action. The combined platform of LC-MS (Liquid-Chromatography-Mass-Spectrometry) has shown promise in moving toward a solution in these areas. In this paper we present atechnique for discovering differences in protein signal between two classes of samples of LC-MS serum proteomic data without use of tandem mass spectrometry, gels or labeling. This method works on data from a lower-precision MS instrument, the type routinely used by and available to the community at large today. We test our technique on a controlled (spike-in) but realistic (serum biomarker discovery) experiment which is therefore verifiable. We also develop a new method for helping to assess the difficulty of a given spike-in problem. Lastly, we show that the problem of class prediction, sometimes mistaken as a solution to biomarker discovery, is actually a much simpler problem.

Results: Using precision–recall curves with experimentally extracted ground truth, we show that (1) our technique has good performance using seven replicates from each class, (2) performance degrades with decreasing number of replicates, (3) the signal that we are teasing out is not trivially available (i.e. the differences are not so large that the task is easy). Lastly, we easily obtain perfect classification results for data in which the problem of extracting differences does not produce absolutely perfect results. This emphasizes the different nature of the two problems and also their relative difficulties.

Availability: Our data are publicly available as a benchmark for further studies of this nature at http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jenn/LCMS

Supplementary Information: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~jennl/LCMS

Contact: jenn{at}cs.toronto.edu



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
E. Lange, C. Gropl, O. Schulz-Trieglaff, A. Leinenbach, C. Huber, and K. Reinert
A geometric approach for the alignment of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry data
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2007; 23(13): i273 - i281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.