Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on September 22, 2007
Bioinformatics 2007 23(21):2954-2956; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm466
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Print PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/21/2954    most recent
btm466v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soria-Carrasco, V.
Right arrow Articles by Castresana, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soria-Carrasco, V.
Right arrow Articles by Castresana, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees

Víctor Soria-Carrasco , Gerard Talavera , Javier Igea and Jose Castresana *

Department of Physiology and Molecular Biodiversity, Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, CSIC, Jordi Girona 18, 08034 Barcelona, Spain

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


  Abstract

Summary: We introduce a new phylogenetic comparison method that measures overall differences in the relative branch length and topology of two phylogenetic trees. To do this, the algorithm first scales one of the trees to have a global divergence as similar as possible to the other tree. Then, the branch length distance, which takes differences in topology and branch lengths into account, is applied to the two trees. We thus obtain the minimum branch length distance or K tree score. Two trees with very different relative branch lengths get a high K score whereas two trees that follow a similar among-lineage rate variation get a low score, regardless of the overall rates in both trees. There are several applications of the K tree score, two of which are explained here in more detail. First, this score allows the evaluation of the performance of phylogenetic algorithms, not only with respect to their topological accuracy, but also with respect to the reproduction of a given branch length variation. In a second example, we show how the K score allows the selection of orthologous genes by choosing those that better follow the overall shape of a given reference tree.

Availability: http://molevol.ibmb.csic.es/Ktreedist.html

Contact: jcvagr{at}ibmb.csic.es

Associate Editor: Keith Crandall

Received on June 26, 2007; revised on August 13, 2007; accepted on September 6, 2007

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.