Co-evolving residues in membrane proteins
1Department of Genome Oriented Bioinformatics, Technische Universität München, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan, 85350 Freising, Germany and 2Department of Biochemistry, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, 69978 Ramat Aviv, Israel
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Motivation: The analysis of co-evolving residues has been exhaustively evaluated for the prediction of intramolecular amino acid contacts in soluble proteins. Although a variety of different methods for the detection of these co-evolving residues have been developed, the fraction of correctly predicted contacts remained insufficient for their reliable application in the construction of structural models. Membrane proteins, which constitute between one-fourth and one-third of all proteins in an organism, were only considered in few individual case studies.
Results: We present the first general study of correlated mutations in 
-helical membrane proteins. Using seven different prediction algorithms, we extracted co-evolving residues for 14 membrane proteins having a solved 3D structure. On average, distances between correlated pairs of residues lying on different transmembrane segments were found to be significantly smaller compared to a random prediction. Covariation of residues was frequently found in direct sequence neighborhood to helix–helix contacts. Based on the results obtained from individual prediction methods, we constructed a consensus prediction for every protein in the dataset that combines obtained correlations from different prediction algorithms and simultaneously removes likely false positives. Using this consensus prediction, 53% of all predicted residue pairs were found within one helix turn of an observed helix–helix contact. Based on the combination of co-evolving residues detected with the four best prediction algorithms, interacting helices could be predicted with a specificity of 83% and sensitivity of 42%.
Availability: http://webclu.bio.wzw.tum.de/helixcorr/
Contact: d.frishman{at}wzw.tum.de
Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Associate Editor: Anna Tramontano
Received on July 25, 2007; revised on September 10, 2007; accepted on October 8, 2007
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Ashkenazy and Y. Kliger Reducing phylogenetic bias in correlated mutation analysis Protein Eng. Des. Sel., January 12, 2010; (2010) gzp078v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Rose, S. Lorenzen, A. Goede, B. Gruening, and P. W. Hildebrand RHYTHM--a server to predict the orientation of transmembrane helices in channels and membrane-coils Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2009; 37(suppl_2): W575 - W580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Lo, Y.-Y. Chiu, E. A. Rodland, P.-C. Lyu, T.-Y. Sung, and W.-L. Hsu Predicting helix-helix interactions from residue contacts in membrane proteins Bioinformatics, April 15, 2009; 25(8): 996 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Barth, B. Wallner, and D. Baker Prediction of membrane protein structures with complex topologies using limited constraints PNAS, February 3, 2009; 106(5): 1409 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. N. Chi, L. Elfstrom, Y. Shi, T. Snall, A. Engstrom, and P. Jemth Reassessing a sparse energetic network within a single protein domain PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4679 - 4684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|