Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on April 21, 2008
Bioinformatics 2008 24(11):1325-1331; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn198
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Print PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/11/1325    most recent
btn198v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hannenhalli, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hannenhalli, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Eukaryotic transcription factor binding sites—modeling and integrative search methods

Sridhar Hannenhalli *

Penn Center for Bioinformatics and Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

A comprehensive knowledge of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) is important for a mechanistic understanding of transcriptional regulation as well as for inferring gene regulatory networks. Because the DNA motif recognized by a transcription factor is typically short and degenerate, computational approaches for identifying binding sites based only on the sequence motif inevitably suffer from high error rates. Current state-of-the-art techniques for improving computational identification of binding sites can be broadly categorized into two classes: (1) approaches that aim to improve binding motif models by extracting maximal sequence information from experimentally determined binding sites and (2) approaches that supplement binding motif models with additional genomic or other attributes (such as evolutionary conservation). In this review we will discuss recent attempts to improve computational identification of TFBS through these two types of approaches and conclude with thoughts on future development.

Contact: sridharh{at}pcbi.upenn.edu

Associate Editor: Jonathan Wren


Received on February 11, 2008; revised on April 18, 2008; accepted on April 18, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.