Skip Navigation

Bioinformatics 2008 24(16):i220-i226; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn287
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Remy, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ruet, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Remy, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ruet, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

From minimal signed circuits to the dynamics of Boolean regulatory networks

Elisabeth Remy and Paul Ruet *

CNRS, Institut de Mathématiques de Luminy, Campus de Luminy, Case 907, 13288 Marseille Cedex 9, France

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

It is acknowledged that the presence of positive or negative circuits in regulatory networks such as genetic networks is linked to the emergence of significant dynamical properties such as multistability (involved in differentiation) and periodic oscillations (involved in homeostasis). Rules proposed by the biologist R. Thomas assert that these circuits are necessary for such dynamical properties. These rules have been studied by several authors. Their obvious interest is that they relate the rather simple information contained in the structure of the network (signed circuits) to its much more complex dynamical behaviour. We prove in this article a nontrivial converse of these rules, namely that certain positive or negative circuits in a regulatory graph are actually sufficient for the observation of a restricted form of the corresponding dynamical property, differentiation or homeostasis. More precisely, the crucial property that we require is that the circuit be globally minimal. We then apply these results to the vertebrate immune system, and show that the two minimal functional positive circuits of the model indeed behave as modules which combine to explain the presence of the three stable states corresponding to the Th0, Th1 and Th2 cells.

Contact: ruet{at}iml.univ-mrs.fr



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.