Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on January 19, 2008
Bioinformatics 2008 24(5):732-737; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn023
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TagFinder for the quantitative analysis of gas chromatography—mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based metabolite profiling experiments
Department Prof. L. Willmitzer, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Muehlenberg 1, D-14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Motivation: Typical GC-MS-based metabolite profiling experiments may comprise hundreds of chromatogram files, which each contain up to 1000 mass spectral tags (MSTs). MSTs are the characteristic patterns of 
25–250 fragment ions and respective isotopomers, which are generated after gas chromatography (GC) by electron impact ionization (EI) of the separated chemical molecules. These fragment ions are subsequently detected by time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS). MSTs of profiling experiments are typically reported as a list of ions, which are characterized by mass, chromatographic retention index (RI) or retention time (RT), and arbitrary abundance. The first two parameters allow the identification, the later the quantification of the represented chemical compounds. Many software tools have been reported for the pre-processing, the so-called curve resolution and deconvolution, of GC-(EI-TOF)-MS files. Pre-processing tools generate numerical data matrices, which contain all aligned MSTs and samples of an experiment. This process, however, is error prone mainly due to (i) the imprecise RI or RT alignment of MSTs and (ii) the high complexity of biological samples. This complexity causes co-elution of compounds and as a consequence non-selective, in other words impure MSTs. The selection and validation of optimal fragment ions for the specific and selective quantification of simultaneously eluting compounds is, therefore, mandatory. Currently validation is performed in most laboratories under human supervision. So far no software tool supports the non-targeted and user-independent quality assessment of the data matrices prior to statistical analysis. TagFinder may fill this gap.
Strategy: TagFinder facilitates the analysis of all fragment ions, which are observed in GC-(EI-TOF)-MS profiling experiments. The non-targeted approach allows the discovery of novel and unexpected compounds. In addition, mass isotopomer resolution is maintained by TagFinder processing. This feature is essential for metabolic flux analyses and highly useful, but not required for metabolite profiling. Whenever possible, TagFinder gives precedence to chemical means of standardization, for example, the use of internal reference compounds for retention time calibration or quantitative standardization. In addition, external standardization is supported for both compound identification and calibration. The workflow of TagFinder comprises, (i) the import of fragment ion data, namely mass, time and arbitrary abundance (intensity), from a chromatography file interchange format or from peak lists provided by other chromatogram pre-processing software, (ii) the annotation of sample information and grouping of samples into classes, (iii) the RI calculation, (iv) the binning of observed fragment ions of equal mass from different chromatograms into RI windows, (v) the combination of these bins, so-called mass tags, into time groups of co-eluting fragment ions, (vi) the test of time groups for intensity correlated mass tags, (vii) the data matrix generation and (viii) the extraction of selective mass tags supported by compound identification. Thus, TagFinder supports both non-targeted fingerprinting analyses and metabolite targeted profiling.
Availability: Exemplary TagFinder workspaces and test data sets are made available upon request to the contact authors. TagFinder is made freely available for academic use from http://www-en.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/03-research/researchGroups/01-dept1/Root_Metabolism/smp/TagFinder/index.html
Contact: Kopka{at}mpimp-golm.mpg.de
Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online and within the TagFinder download from the above URL.
Associate Editor: Jonathan Wren
Received on November 30, 2007; revised on January 9, 2008; accepted on January 12, 2008
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Weichert, I. Saalbach, H. Weichert, S. Kohl, A. Erban, J. Kopka, B. Hause, A. Varshney, N. Sreenivasulu, M. Strickert, et al. Increasing Sucrose Uptake Capacity of Wheat Grains Stimulates Storage Protein Synthesis Plant Physiology, February 1, 2010; 152(2): 698 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Korn, T. Gartner, A. Erban, J. Kopka, J. Selbig, and D. K. Hincha Predicting Arabidopsis Freezing Tolerance and Heterosis in Freezing Tolerance from Metabolite Composition Mol Plant, January 1, 2010; 3(1): 224 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Skirycz, S. De Bodt, T. Obata, I. De Clercq, H. Claeys, R. De Rycke, M. Andriankaja, O. Van Aken, F. Van Breusegem, A. R. Fernie, et al. Developmental Stage Specificity and the Role of Mitochondrial Metabolism in the Response of Arabidopsis Leaves to Prolonged Mild Osmotic Stress Plant Physiology, January 1, 2010; 152(1): 226 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Angelovici, A. Fait, X. Zhu, J. Szymanski, E. Feldmesser, A. R. Fernie, and G. Galili Deciphering Transcriptional and Metabolic Networks Associated with Lysine Metabolism during Arabidopsis Seed Development Plant Physiology, December 1, 2009; 151(4): 2058 - 2072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Fuhrs, S. Gotze, A. Specht, A. Erban, S. Gallien, D. Heintz, A. Van Dorsselaer, J. Kopka, H.-P. Braun, and W. J. Horst Characterization of leaf apoplastic peroxidases and metabolites in Vigna unguiculata in response to toxic manganese supply and silicon J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2009; 60(6): 1663 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Lippold, D. H. Sanchez, M. Musialak, A. Schlereth, W.-R. Scheible, D. K. Hincha, and M. K. Udvardi AtMyb41 Regulates Transcriptional and Metabolic Responses to Osmotic Stress in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, April 1, 2009; 149(4): 1761 - 1772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. T. van Dongen, A. Frohlich, S. J. Ramirez-Aguilar, N. Schauer, A. R. Fernie, A. Erban, J. Kopka, J. Clark, A. Langer, and P. Geigenberger Transcript and metabolite profiling of the adaptive response to mild decreases in oxygen concentration in the roots of arabidopsis plants Ann. Bot., January 1, 2009; 103(2): 269 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Neuweger, S. P. Albaum, M. Dondrup, M. Persicke, T. Watt, K. Niehaus, J. Stoye, and A. Goesmann MeltDB: a software platform for the analysis and integration of metabolomics experiment data Bioinformatics, December 1, 2008; 24(23): 2726 - 2732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Eisenhut, J. Huege, D. Schwarz, H. Bauwe, J. Kopka, and M. Hagemann Metabolome Phenotyping of Inorganic Carbon Limitation in Cells of the Wild Type and Photorespiratory Mutants of the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803 Plant Physiology, December 1, 2008; 148(4): 2109 - 2120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|