Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on March 10, 2009
Bioinformatics 2009 25(10):1223-1230; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp119
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Print PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/10/1223    most recent
btp119v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pique-Regi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Asgharzadeh, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pique-Regi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Asgharzadeh, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Joint estimation of copy number variation and reference intensities on multiple DNA arrays using GADA

Roger Pique-Regi 1,2,*, Antonio Ortega 1 and Shahab Asgharzadeh 2,*

1Signal and Image Processing Institute, Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, EEB 400, 3740 McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2564 and 2Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology, Saban Research Institute, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Motivation: The complexity of a large number of recently discovered copy number polymorphisms is much higher than initially thought, thus making it more difficult to detect them in the presence of significant measurement noise. In this scenario, separate normalization and segmentation is prone to lead to many false detections of changes in copy number. New approaches capable of jointly modeling the copy number and the non-copy number (noise) hybridization effects across multiple samples will potentially lead to more accurate results.

Methods: In this article, the genome alteration detection analysis (GADA) approach introduced in our previous work is extended to a multiple sample model. The copy number component is independent for each sample and uses a sparse Bayesian prior, while the reference hybridization level is not necessarily sparse but identical on all samples. The expectation maximization (EM) algorithm used to fit the model iteratively determines whether the observed hybridization levels are more likely due to a copy number variation or to a shared hybridization bias.

Results: The new proposed approach is compared with the currently used strategy of separate normalization followed by independent segmentation of each array. Real microarray data obtained from HapMap samples are randomly partitioned to create different reference sets. Using the new approach, copy number and reference intensity estimates are significantly less variable if the reference set changes; and a higher consistency on copy numbers detected within HapMap family trios is obtained. Finally, the running time to fit the model grows linearly in the number samples and probes.

Availability:http://biron.usc.edu/~piquereg/GADA

Contact: rpique{at}ieee.org; shahab{at}chla.usc.edu

Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Associate Editor: John Quackenbush


Received on October 14, 2008; revised on February 17, 2009; accepted on February 26, 2009

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.