Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on April 8, 2009
Bioinformatics 2009 25(12):1506-1512; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp238
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Print PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/12/1506    most recent
btp238v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fornes, O.
Right arrow Articles by Oliva, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fornes, O.
Right arrow Articles by Oliva, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

ModLink+: improving fold recognition by using protein–protein interactions

Oriol Fornes 1, Ramon Aragues 1, Jordi Espadaler 1,{dagger}, Marc A. Marti-Renom 2, Andrej Sali 3,4,5 and Baldo Oliva 1,*

1Structural Bioinformatics Lab (GRIB-IMIM), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Parc de Recerca Biomèdica de Barcelona (PRBB), Barcelona, Catalonia, 2Structural Genomics Unit, Bioinformatics & Genomics Department, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), Valencia, Spain, 3Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, 4Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and 5California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Motivation:Several strategies have been developed to predict the fold of a target protein sequence, most of which are based on aligning the target sequence to other sequences of known structure. Previously, we demonstrated that the consideration of protein–protein interactions significantly increases the accuracy of fold assignment compared with PSI-BLAST sequence comparisons. A drawback of our method was the low number of proteins to which a fold could be assigned. Here, we present an improved version of the method that addresses this limitation. We also compare our method to other state-of-the-art fold assignment methodologies.

Results: Our approach (ModLink+) has been tested on 3716 proteins with domain folds classified in the Structural Classification Of Proteins (SCOP) as well as known interacting partners in the Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP). For this test set, the ratio of success [positive predictive value (PPV)] on fold assignment increases from 75% for PSI-BLAST, 83% for HHSearch and 81% for PRC to >90% for ModLink+at the e-value cutoff of 10–3. Under this e-value, ModLink+can assign a fold to 30–45% of the proteins in the test set, while our previous method could cover <25%. When applied to 6384 proteins with unknown fold in the yeast proteome, ModLink+combined with PSI-BLAST assigns a fold for domains in 3738 proteins, while PSI-BLAST alone covers only 2122 proteins, HHSearch 2969 and PRC 2826 proteins, using a threshold e-value that would represent a PPV >82% for each method in the test set.

Availability: The ModLink+server is freely accessible in the World Wide Web at http://sbi.imim.es/modlink/.

Contact: boliva{at}imim.es.

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

{dagger}Present address: AB-Biotics S.L, Masia Can Fatjó Del Molí s/n, 08290 Cerdanyola del vallès, Catalonia, Spain.

Associate editor: Alfonso Valencia


Received on December 23, 2008; revised on March 12, 2009; accepted on April 4, 2009

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.