Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on May 4, 2009
Bioinformatics 2009 25(13):1655-1661; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp292
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Print PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/13/1655    most recent
btp292v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tseng, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tseng, G. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Ratio adjustment and calibration scheme for gene-wise normalization to enhance microarray inter-study prediction

Chunrong Cheng 1, Kui Shen 2, Chi Song 1, Jianhua Luo 3 and George C. Tseng 1,2,4,*

1Department of Biostatistics, 2Department of Computational Biology, 3Department of Pathology and 4Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Motivation: Reproducibility analyses of biologically relevant microarray studies have mostly focused on overlap of detected biomarkers or correlation of differential expression evidences across studies. For clinical utility, direct inter-study prediction (i.e. to establish a prediction model in one study and apply to another) for disease diagnosis or prognosis prediction is more important. Normalization plays a key role for such a task. Traditionally, sample-wise normalization has been a standard for inter-array and inter-study normalization. For gene-wise normalization, it has been implemented for intra-study or inter-study predictions in a few papers while its rationale, strategy and effect remain unexplored.

Results: In this article, we investigate the effect of gene-wise normalization in microarray inter-study prediction. Gene-specific intensity discrepancies across studies are commonly found even after proper sample-wise normalization. We explore the rationale and necessity of gene-wise normalization. We also show that the ratio of sample sizes in normal versus diseased groups can greatly affect the performance of gene-wise normalization and an analytical method is developed to adjust for the imbalanced ratio effect. Both simulation results and applications to three lung cancer and two prostate cancer data sets, considering both binary classification and survival risk predictions, showed significant and robust improvement of the new adjustment. A calibration scheme is developed to apply the ratio-adjusted gene-wise normalization for prospective clinical trials. The number of calibration samples needed is estimated from existing studies and suggested for future applications. The result has important implication to the translational research of microarray as a practical disease diagnosis and prognosis prediction tool.

Contact: ctseng{at}pitt.edu

Availability: http://www.biostat.pitt.edu/bioinfo/

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Associate Editor: David Rocke


Received on November 8, 2008; revised on April 13, 2009; accepted on April 27, 2009

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.