Skip Navigation

Bioinformatics 2009 25(14):1796-1801; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp267
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (Print PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data 1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guillot, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guillot, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

On the inference of spatial structure from population genetics data

Gilles Guillot 1,2,3

1 Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern 0316, Oslo Norway, 2 Gothenburg Stochastic Centre, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden and 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, INRA/Agro-ParisTech, Paris, France


   Abstract

Motivation: In a series of recent papers, Tess, a computer program based on the concept of hidden Markov random field, has been proposed to infer the number and locations of panmictic population units from the genotypes and spatial locations of these individuals. The method seems to be of broad appeal as it is conceptually much simpler than other competing methods and it has been reported by its authors to be fast and accurate. However, this methodology is not grounded in a formal statistical inference method and seems to rely to a large extent on arbitrary choices regarding the parameters used. The present article is an investigation of the accuracy of this method and an attempt to assess whether recent results reported on the basis of this method are genuine features of the genetic process or artefacts of the method.

Method: I analyse simulated data consisting of populations at Hardy–Weinberg and linkage equilibrium and also data simulated under a scenario of isolation-by-distance at mutation–migration–drift equilibrium. Arabidopsis thaliana data previously analysed with this method are also reconsidered.

Results: Using the Tess program under the no-admixture model to analyse data consisting of several genuine HWLE populations with individuals of pure ancestries leads to highly inaccurate results; Using the Tess program under the admixture model to analyse data consisting of a continuous isolation-by-distance population leads to the inference of spurious HWLE populations whose number and features depend on the parameters used. Results previously reported about the A.thaliana using Tess seem to a large extent to be artefacts of the statistical methodology used. The findings go beyond population clustering models and can be an help to design more efficient algorithms based on graphs.

Availability: The data analysed in the present article are available from http://folk.uio.no/gillesg/Bioinformatics-HMRF

Contact: gilles.guillot{at}bio.uio.no

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Associate Editor: Alex Bateman


Received on March 6, 2009; revised on April 6, 2009; accepted on April 16, 2009

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.