Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on December 3, 2008
Bioinformatics 2009 25(3):346-352; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn620
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/3/346    most recent
btn620v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Myasnikova, E.
Right arrow Articles by Reinitz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Myasnikova, E.
Right arrow Articles by Reinitz, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Estimation of errors introduced by confocal imaging into the data on segmentation gene expression in Drosophila

Ekaterina Myasnikova 1,*, Svetlana Surkova 1, Lena Panok 2, Maria Samsonova 1 and John Reinitz 2

1St Petersburg State Polytechnic University, St Petersburg, 195251, Russia and 2Stony Brook University, New York, 11794-3600, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Motivation: Currently the confocal scanning microscopy of fluorescently tagged molecules is extensively employed to acquire quantitative data on gene expression at cellular resolution. Following this approach, we generated a large dataset on the expression of segmentation genes in the Drosophila blastoderm, that is widely used in systems biology studies. As data accuracy is of critical importance for the success of studies in this field, we took a shot to evaluate possible errors introduced in the data by acquisition and processing methods. This article deals with errors introduced by confocal microscope.

Results: In confocal imaging, the inevitable photon noise is commonly reduced by the averaging of multiple frames. The averaging may introduce errors into the data, if single frames are clipped by microscope hardware. A method based on censoring technique is used to estimate and correct this type of errors. Additional source of errors is the quantification of blurred images. To estimate and correct these errors, the Richardson–Lucy deconvolution method was modified to provide the higher accuracy of data read off from blurred images of the Drosophila blastoderm. We have found that the sizes of errors introduced by confocal imaging make up ~5–7% of the mean intensity values and do not disguise the dynamic behavior and characteristic features of gene expression patterns. We also defined a range of microscope parameters for the acquisition of sufficiently accurate data.

Availability: http://urchin.spbcas.ru/downloads/step/step.htm

Contact: myasnikova{at}spbcas.ru

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Associate Editor: Olga Troyanskaya


Received on July 18, 2008; revised on November 25, 2008; accepted on November 27, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
L. Zamparo and T. J. Perkins
Statistical lower bounds on protein copy number from fluorescence expression images
Bioinformatics, October 15, 2009; 25(20): 2670 - 2676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.