Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Print PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fielding, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fielding, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1987 IRL Press Ltd.

Expert systems: frames, rules or logic for species identification?

Marion Edwards 3,, David R. Morse 1,2 and Alan H. Fielding *,

Department of Biological Sciences, Manchester Polytechnic, John Dalton Building Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK
1 Department of Biology, University of York York YOl 5DD, UK

*To whom reprint requests should be sent

The role of expert systems in species identification, with particular reference to the problems posed by damaged specimens and inexperienced taxonomists, is discussed. Of the three main types of expert system available, the frame–based system is shown to provide the most appropriate model for a taxonomic expert system rather than a logic– or rule–based system. The advantages of an expert system over other computer–aided methods of identification are considered. A rule–based system requires the original knowledge (species descriptions) to be structured into rules, whereas a frame–based system can store the generic and specific descriptions in a series of frames. The frames fall into a hierarchy which closely resembles the taxonomic hierarchy, and down which information can be inherited. Two aspects of frame–based systems considered are the use of probabilities in identification, and the optimum structure of the knowledge base. The conventional use of probabilities is to provide an indication of the correctness of the result. However, in some studies involving the identification of many specimens, the speed of identification may be increased (with a reduction in accuracy) if identifications are made to a predetermined probability level. Although frames allow accurate representation of the taxonomic hierarchy, a semantic net, incorporating structures of the organism and/or details of the habitat may result in a more efficient expert system.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.