Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Print PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kozhukhin, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pevzner, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kozhukhin, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pevzner, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© IRL Press

Genome inhomogeneity is determined mainly by WW and SS dinucleotides

Costya G. Kozhukhin and Pavel A. Pevzner 1,2

Institute of Control Sciences Moscow 117342
1Laboratory of Mathematical Methods, Institute of Genetics of Microorganisms Moscow 113545, USSR

2To whom reprint requests should be sent

According to the hypothesis of the modular structure of DNA, genomes consist of modules of various nature which may differ in statistical characteristics. Statistical analysis helps in revealing the differences in statistical characteristics and predicting the modular structure. In this connection the question about the contribution of each word of length l (l-tuple) to the inhomogeneity of genetic text arises. The notion of stationary (i.e. relatively evenly distributed over a genome) versus non-stationary l-tuples has been introduced previously. In this paper, the dinucleotide distributions for all long sequences from GenBank were analyzed and it was shown that non-stationary dinucleotides are closely associated with polyW and polyS tracts (W denotes ‘weak’ nucleotides A or T, while S stands for the ‘strong’ nucleotides G or C). Thus, genome inhomogeneity is shown to be determined mainly by AA, TT, GG, CC, AT, TA, GC and CG dinucleotides. It has been demonstrated that neither ‘codon usage’ nor the ‘isochore model’ can account for this phenomenon.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ScienceHome page
S Karlin and V Brendel
Chance and statistical significance in protein and DNA sequence analysis
Science, July 3, 1992; 257(5066): 39 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.