Skip Navigation



Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on September 16, 2009

Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp540
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/22/2992    most recent
btp540v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Doom, T. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Doom, T. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Characterization of 1H NMR spectroscopic data and the generation of synthetic validation sets

Paul E. Anderson 1, Michael L. Raymer 1, Benjamin J. Kelly 1, Nicholas V. Reo 2, Nicholas J. DelRaso 3 and T. E. Doom 1

1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Dayton, OH 45435
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Cox Institute, Dayton, OH 45429
3Air Force Research Laboratory, Biosciences and Protection Division, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Paul Anderson E-mail: anderson.51{at}wright.edu


   Abstract

Motivation: Common contemporary practice within the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics community is to evaluate and validate novel algorithms on empirical data or simplified simulated data. Empirical data captures the complex characteristics of experimental data, but the optimal or most correct analysis is unknown a priori; therefore, researchers are forced to rely on indirect performance metrics, which are of limited value. In order to achieve fair and complete analysis of competing techniques more exacting metrics are required. Thus, metabolomics researchers often evaluate their algorithms on simplified simulated data with a known answer. Unfortunately, the conclusions obtained on simulated data are only of value if the data sets are complex enough for results to generalize to true experimental data. Ideally, synthetic data should be indistinguishable from empirical data, yet retain a known best analysis.

Results: We have developed a technique for creating realistic synthetic metabolomics validation sets based on NMR spectroscopic data. The validation sets are developed by characterizing the salient distributions in sets of empirical spectroscopic data. Using this technique, several validation sets are constructed with a variety of characteristics present in "real" data. A case study is then presented to compare the relative accuracy of several alignment algorithms using the increased precision afforded by these synthetic data sets.

Availability: These data sets are available for download at http://birg.cs.wright.edu/nmr_synthetic_data_sets.

Contact: travis.doom{at}wright.edu

Associate Editor: Prof. John Quackenbush


Received on June 3, 2009; revised on August 28, 2009; accepted on September 7, 2009

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.