Skip Navigation

Corrigendum for Berrar et al., Bioinformatics 22 (10) 1245-1250.
Bioinformatics 2006 22(19):2453; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl435
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Corrigendum

Bioinformatics (2006) 22(10), 1245–1250

Avoiding model selection bias in small-sample genomic datasets

Daniel Berrar, Ian Bradbury and Werner Dubitzky

The authors would like to apologize for an error in the calculation of the true error rate {tau} based on Equation (1), which entailed too narrow intervals for this equation.

On page 1248, the confidence interval for {tau} based on Equation (1) is given by {tau} = 15.00 ± 0.08. Here, the center is given as percentage (i.e. 15%), whereas the limits are not. The correct approximate interval is {tau} {approx} 0.15 ± 0.07499. As a consequence, the statements concerning the comparisons of the intervals based on the different equations need to be corrected:

For M = 100 and {varepsilon} = 0.15, the widths of the intervals are 0.14998 for Equation (1), 0.13978 for Equation (2) and 0.13826 for Equation (3).

For M = 300 and {varepsilon} = 0.15, the corresponding widths are 0.08415 for Equation (1), 0.08079 for Equation (2) and 0.08048 for Equation (3). The confidence interval based on Equation (1) as shown in Figure 1 is too narrow. The corrected figure is shown below.


Figure 1

Page 1247, second column, lines 19–20: ‘[...] an approximate (1 – {alpha})%-credibility interval [...]’ should be ‘[...] an approximate (1 – {alpha})-credibility interval [...]’.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?