Skip Navigation

Corrigendum for Wichert et al., Bioinformatics 20 (1) 5-20.

Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on August 21, 2008
Bioinformatics 2008 24(19):2274; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn430
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/19/2274    most recent
btn430v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wichert, S.
Right arrow Articles by Strimmer, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wichert, S.
Right arrow Articles by Strimmer, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Identifying periodically expressed transcripts in microarray time series data

Sofia Wichert , Konstantinos Fokianos and Korbinian Strimmer

Bioinformatics (2004) 20(1), 5–20

The authors are grateful to Professor Susan R. Wilson (Australian National University, Canberra) and Professor William Dunsmuir (University of New South Wales) for bringing the following error in Equation (5) to our attention: for sample size N even the intensity of the peak belonging to the Fourier frequency {pi} must not be included in the calculation of the g-statistic. Correspondingly, the summation in the denominator and the maximization in the numerator of Equation (5) runs through indices k=1 to k=[(N – 1)/2], rather than to k=[N/2] as stated in our paper. Accordingly, we have corrected the implementation of our algorithm in the R package ‘GeneCycle’ (versions 1.0.4 and later), which is available from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GeneCycle/.

The above change affects the evaluation of statistical significance of time series with an even number of time points only. For the readers’ convenience, we provide here an update of Table 2. Note that the revised estimates of the number of periodic genes are more conservative under the correct computation of the g-statistic. This is a consequence of the implicit reduction in sample size due to the removal of the {pi} frequency.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Datasets analyzed in this paper and results of FDR test

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/19/2274    most recent
btn430v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wichert, S.
Right arrow Articles by Strimmer, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wichert, S.
Right arrow Articles by Strimmer, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?